<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Those Political Talk Show Pundits</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 22:52:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/16/105308.php#comment-153886</link>
<description>I agree -- it&#039;s that quality and his passion for pure politics that keeps me watching. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153886@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 22:52:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RealCon</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/16/105308.php#comment-153885</link>
<description>In the imperfect world of punditry, Chris Matthews is the least imperfect. I say that because he doesn&#039;t let guests evade questions by answering something else.  I find it frustrating when a question is asked and a guest is allowed to evade the issue and talk about something else -- thinking that no one will notice. It&#039;s his show and Matthews controls it.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153885@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 22:50:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by sydney</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/16/105308.php#comment-153820</link>
<description>Do you think its possible that he wrote lefty speeches without neccesarily without believing much of what he wrote?  

I mean, if I were hired by GWB to write speeches I would take the gig despite my hatred of the man. It&#039;s a career opportunity.

Perhaps its unlikely? I dont know...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153820@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 20:09:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joe</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/16/105308.php#comment-153814</link>
<description>Chris Matthews spent his formative years as a speechwriter for President Carter and was a senior aide to Tip O&#039;Neill.  Just sayin&#039;, you know?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153814@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 20:05:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by sydney</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/16/105308.php#comment-153809</link>
<description>I agree with ERic.  From where I stand, politicaly, MAthews is way right.

If he is indeed a visable and biased representative of the left in America, than I feel feel awfully depressed about America&#039;s prospects for the future.

PErsonally I think Mathews is an idiot as are most pundits on TV.  They arn&#039;t hired for thier intelligence or their objective journalism, they are hired because they are entertaining and intriguing.

Anyone who watches fox news has given up on watching objective journalism anyway. They are simply tuning in to have someone re-confirm what they already beleive.  its lame.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153809@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 19:58:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/16/105308.php#comment-153778</link>
<description>Brit Hume has liberals at his table? 

I love Matthews. If he has a liberal bias, he hides it really well.

I&#039;m switching this over the politics section as that seems most appropriate for the subject matter. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153778@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 18:39:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>