<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <i>The Fallen Ones</i> Sci-Fi Channel Original Review</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:53:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by mackjones</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/15/000815.php#comment-231272</link>
<description>this is a master piece</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">231272@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:53:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/15/000815.php#comment-180602</link>
<description>See, you said it yourself. This was one of Sci-Fi&#039;s better flicks. When you review them each week, that&#039;s what you&#039;re comparing them to. Fallen Ones worked for all its absurdity simply because it knew how much it sucked. You&#039;re looking for logic flaws in a movie about a 50-foot tall mummy. Think about that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">180602@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:07:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dara</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/15/000815.php#comment-180333</link>
<description>Are you freaking kidding me that review?  This movie is HORRIBLE!!!!  Do you know the director or something?  Is Casper your cousin?  What was up with the purple guys just coming out of nowhere?  How freaking weird was that?  And, hello, how did the &quot;mummy driver&quot; re-appear at the end after we saw him go crashing over a cliff?  How the HELL did this movie get funded?  Why did Tom Bosley do it?  After all those years on Happy Days, the poor guy has to add this piece of crap to his resume?  Although, I will say, Tom did what he could.  And poor Robert Wagner.  There should be a support group for these guys because seeing the film was surely a traumatic experience for them.  With all this said, I do believe this is one of the Sci-Fi Channel&#039;s better movies.  And that is a very sad, sad thing.  At least I made it to the end, with the help of  my fast forward button.  And, I was so shocked at how bad this movie was, that I went searching for reviews.  So, it had some impact.  As for the sponsors who filled the commercial blocks, they should get a refund!  I&#039;m betting this movie turned away quite a few people.  Well, at least it was better than The Bone Snatcher.  That was a snoozer.  Has no one thought to fire the people responsible for picking the Sci-Fi Channel&#039;s movies?  It seriously makes me want to stop watching the channel.  Is there some kind of award for the worst television movies ever made.  Sci-Fi should win.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">180333@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:10:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by janeyolen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/15/000815.php#comment-153404</link>
<description>Glad there was some payoff at the end. I bailed out early, embarrassed for everyone attached to the film.

The original premise intrigued me because way back in college in the Cretaceous Period!) I wrote a poem based on the same Biblical sentence:&quot;The sons of God saw the daughters of man that they were fair.&quot;

Blech.

Jane</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">153404@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 06:18:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>