REVIEW

The Fallen Ones Sci-Fi Channel Original Review

Written by Matt Paprocki
Published May 15, 2005

With a title like the Fallen Ones, you're probably expecting a documentary on World War II. Maybe you're imagining a movie about past and deceased baseball players. Would you guess it's a movie about a 42-foot tall mummy that eats people? Could you possibly guess it's the best 42-foot mummy that eats people movie ever? Well, it is, and even if it doesn't sound like it, that means something.

The difference between this and the other Sci-Fi Channel dreck is that it knows it's ridiculous. It has a sense of humor about itself and runs with it. The only thing it's missing is some pacing to keep it moving.

Laughs are both intentional and unintentional. The opening moments are hideously bad, seemingly using special effects techniques from 1962 to make a man appear as a giant. It all tells the back-story about a fallen angel that came to Earth to mate with a human women, in the process creating the giant that causes all these problems in the present day.

It takes forever to get to the good stuff, which is of course the giant mummy rampage. It plays out like a low budget version of a summer popcorn flick, complete with the wisecracking sidekick and cheap one-liners. It's all so stupid, yet so entertaining. The special effects are way above average; the giant mummy is actually pulled off in a way that it almost seems believable... almost.

Getting to that point is going to require some patience. You'll tolerate most of the performances, including Tom Bosley as a likeable Rabbi and Casper Van Dien as the lead. Unfortunately, even with some bible connections and a few jokes strewn around, it's just not much fun until the last 20-minutes or so. While it does make up for a lot of lost ground with the finale, it's tough to forget the fact that you've just sat through 70-minutes of uselessness. Not even the epic-like music (likely culled from other sources) can dilute your thoughts.

The Fallen Ones isn't a great movie, but on the Sci-Fi Channel scale, it fares pretty well for itself. It may even be one of their best. It's a little unique and a little clichéd at the same time, but don't let that take you out of it. It's well worth fast forwarding through it you have to, though the payoff seems better if you make it all the way through.

Matt Paprocki is the former reviews editor for Digital Press, a video game website with an appreciation for the retro side of the industry. The deep game collection which spans nearly 30 systems and 2,000 games line his walls for research purposes. Matt strives to bring credibility to video game journalism, and take it in a new direction to aid the industry in becoming respected with all forms entertainment media. He currently freelances for GameArgus.com and MultiPlayerGames.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Fallen Ones Sci-Fi Channel Original Review
Published: May 15, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: SF, Video: Television
Part of a feature: Sci-Fi TV Films
Writer: Matt Paprocki
Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
Matt Paprocki's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Matt Paprocki
Video: SF
Video: Television
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 16, 2005 @ 06:18AM — janeyolen

Glad there was some payoff at the end. I bailed out early, embarrassed for everyone attached to the film.

The original premise intrigued me because way back in college in the Cretaceous Period!) I wrote a poem based on the same Biblical sentence:"The sons of God saw the daughters of man that they were fair."

Blech.

Jane

#2 — July 11, 2005 @ 02:10AM — dara

Are you freaking kidding me that review? This movie is HORRIBLE!!!! Do you know the director or something? Is Casper your cousin? What was up with the purple guys just coming out of nowhere? How freaking weird was that? And, hello, how did the "mummy driver" re-appear at the end after we saw him go crashing over a cliff? How the HELL did this movie get funded? Why did Tom Bosley do it? After all those years on Happy Days, the poor guy has to add this piece of crap to his resume? Although, I will say, Tom did what he could. And poor Robert Wagner. There should be a support group for these guys because seeing the film was surely a traumatic experience for them. With all this said, I do believe this is one of the Sci-Fi Channel's better movies. And that is a very sad, sad thing. At least I made it to the end, with the help of my fast forward button. And, I was so shocked at how bad this movie was, that I went searching for reviews. So, it had some impact. As for the sponsors who filled the commercial blocks, they should get a refund! I'm betting this movie turned away quite a few people. Well, at least it was better than The Bone Snatcher. That was a snoozer. Has no one thought to fire the people responsible for picking the Sci-Fi Channel's movies? It seriously makes me want to stop watching the channel. Is there some kind of award for the worst television movies ever made. Sci-Fi should win.

#3 — July 11, 2005 @ 16:07PM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

See, you said it yourself. This was one of Sci-Fi's better flicks. When you review them each week, that's what you're comparing them to. Fallen Ones worked for all its absurdity simply because it knew how much it sucked. You're looking for logic flaws in a movie about a 50-foot tall mummy. Think about that.

#4 — September 11, 2005 @ 22:53PM — mackjones

this is a master piece

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/29512)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments