Blogcritics: Comments on Penile humor and the First Amendment

Comment by Steve

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:03:17 EDT

Only in Grand Rapids could a channel-surfing cable TV subscriber be allowed to masquarade as a "victim" of a sex crime (indecent exposure). The case ought to be subtitled "When depictions of penises attack...

Comment by Sally

Sat, 24 Sep 2005 05:21:49 EDT

This Timothy Huffman is NOT a nice person at all. I don't mind humor using a talking penis on cable TV, seen it done in the past and was quite humorous, however, this person also goes into a Widow & Widowers Chatroom on the computer and taunts people with unkind remarks about their dead spouses. He doesn't have any respect for people grieving the loss of their loved ones. He calls it "free speech" continues relentlessly when asked to stop and says he has a right to visit a public room and say whatever he wants. I call it unbecoming, harrassment and totally unnecessary. Sally

Comment by Tim Huffman

Wed, 18 May 2005 12:46:17 EDT

Thank you very much for the wonderful article having to do with my Free Speech case in Grand Rapids, Mi. over Dick Smart the so-called "talking penis". I appreciate the positive "exposure" and will frequent this site again.

Comment by bhw

Sat, 14 May 2005 19:26:49 EDT

The Dick Smart character portrayed on TV screens was likely larger than life and it continued for fully three minutes, much longer than would have likely been allowed [in a public square]. I'd bet that this is one of the unintentionally funniest lines written in the annals of law. Oooh, scary big flacid penis!