<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on DVD Pick of the Week. 5/10</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 19:19:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/10/072038.php#comment-150744</link>
<description>Well, they are 2 different films. THe two films are different and the same, the new one definitely amps up the action. Whereas the first one had a slow burn thing going on, this one ratchets up the tension. 

I am not sure I could say this is a better version. But for those who did not like the first, should give this one a shot. I think you may like it. (says the guy who knows nothing of your tastes :) )</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">150744@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 19:19:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by -E</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/10/072038.php#comment-150741</link>
<description>Is this new version more entertaining than the original? I know you say they are different, but does it add to the film? I was sceptical to see it because I didn&#039;t like the original (I seem to get bored in movies easily), but with the differences, I am wondering if I should give it a look.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">150741@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 19:08:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/10/072038.php#comment-150738</link>
<description>I recently reviewed the Marillion DVD, or at least tried to I don&#039;t think it came out as good as I had hoped &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/072516.php&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;

In Good Company was a great film, and was even at the top of my theater list until I saw SIn City.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">150738@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 18:59:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Frans</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/10/072038.php#comment-150553</link>
<description>I have a well documented weakness for Marillion&#039;s Marbles on the Road DVD, so I salute that choice!!

Frans</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">150553@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 13:19:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by visualsimplicity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/10/072038.php#comment-150514</link>
<description>My pick would be &lt;i&gt;In Good Company&lt;/i&gt;. It was a cliched plot that did not play out as a cliche. A pleasant surprise and worth a pick up.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">150514@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 11:53:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>