http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005 by the authors Tue, 10 May 2005 11:35:31 EDT http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150508 Just thought I'd add my two cents... I was able to block out what I did not like with Episode I. But not so with II. He just lost me. The acting was SO bad. The romance so unbearable. And...then... the thing they did with Yoda. Oh god. It was a nightmare. I suppose I will see the new movie, sometime, maybe on video. Or something. I don't know. 150508@blogcritics.org Tue, 10 May 2005 11:35:31 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150246 I don't recall saying anything about ROTS. I am looking forward to seeing it, for the exact reasons you say, Michele. I am pleased to hear that initial reviews have been almost universally positive. I just cannot stand people dismissing someone who was disappointed with the last 2 movies ala comment 5. Sometimes you need to be a little strident. And George Lucas is a self-hating retard for fucking with the first 3 movies. Perhaps the rest of his life is normal, but there is something clearly wrong with someone who cannot leave well enough alone. He should be psycho analyzed, and them lobotomized. You need only listen to that abhorrent song inserted into the end of Jedi, plus the insertion of Hayden Christiansen into the vision Luke sees. 150246@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 18:40:38 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150240 Oh, and if Lucas pulls this off and RotS is as awesome as I hope, I will gladly gobble his nob while drinking his Kool Aid. 150240@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 18:30:24 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150239 Yea, but you were just a little strident, don't ya think? Fact is, I hate George Lucas. There's a reason my blog is number one on Google for "George Lucas is a fuckwad." I hated I and II. But I also know that this movie is going to be good FOR ME, despite Lucas, simply because it's going to make the story finally come full circle. And I've read over a dozen reviews already and not a single one of them was negative. 150239@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 18:28:04 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150238 Well how about starting with not calling people kool-aid drinking nob-gobblers. That'll go a long way. (Although if you had put that together as "kool-aid drinking nob-gobblers" I may have laughed because that phrase is just funny.) I don't know (m)any "retarded" people - to use your word - who are as rich or as imaginative as Lucas. Yep, the plots are fairly weak - but they do touch on the big keystones of literary tradition and thought. And there's a big up side - they're enjoyable films. 150238@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 18:27:39 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150236 Temple--so should we blow up film criticism/music reviews/book reviews etc because people either "like it or the don't"? Isn't that what the comments are for? Someone says the last 2 movies suck, and then someone says, "No they don't, they rule". And then someone else (me) says they do, in fact, suck, and so does Lucas. I thought that's how it worked. 150236@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 18:19:49 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150221 Jeez, Matt, here's how it works. It's a film - OK series of films. People either enjoy it or they don't. 150221@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 17:58:30 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150217 I cannot believe the koolaid drinking Lucas devotees. If Clones had been just Lucas taking a shit for 2 hours, you guy would still be slobbing his knob. The last 2 movies were the most over-computerized movies, and they looked like shit. And Lucas is a fricking retard for fucking with the first three movies. I'll think of him always as an opportunistic whore first, and a filmmaker second. 150217@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 17:54:29 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150057 Ah, I see old age has taken away the imagination of the Force. For you who happened to see the 3 originals in the theatre and dismiss the spectacle of the Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones - do not understand the entire story. You want to bash the new movies with bad acting and screenplay - but there wasn't any. It is that simple. RotS is going to be amazing - probably the most liked by myself. So in order of liking it will go: 3, 5, 2, 6, 4, 1 - and yes I know that the third will be the best. Retrace your Force history and recapture the brilliance of the first trilogy by going to the best of the series - Revenge of the Sith. 150057@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 12:25:06 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150049 Shock and suprise, the movies you saw at 14 were "awesome" but the movies you see at 34...not so much. What a jerk. These are movies that inspire children Sorry it didn't have enough t&A and cursing for you Mr. Grown-Up man!! I laugh at your patheticness. 150049@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 12:14:59 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150047 To this day i don't understand the Prequel bashing that has occured for the past years. Yes, they were not as good as the 1st trilogy but they were still Star Wars movies and they were still entertaining! Yes, I skip over the 9 minute pod-race in Phantom and 9 minute speeder chase scene in Clones, but seeing Qui-Gon fight Darth Maul and Yoda pull out his lightsaber, or multipule jedi fight on Geonosis!?!? Come on yall, it was amazing to see! Stop hating, Revenge of the Sith might even top some of the originals! 150047@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 12:13:42 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150045 I think the latest Star Wars movies contained all of the epic themes that the earlier "sequels" had. What has changed is our expectations, the fact that many of the original viewers have grown up over the last 30 years, and we have been desensitized to the grandness of Star Wars due to the adoption of film making technologies that the first Star Wars films made popular. I love all of the Star Wars films, including the most recent, for their ability to spark the imagination and hit on themes that we can all relate to. The first 3 films focused on a good vs. evil dynamic which struck a chord during the cold war era, and now the theme is about child development, focusing on Anakin's character. 150045@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 12:09:26 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150030 I agree - Lucas has trashed a perfectly good story with rotten acting, terrible script and no engaging plots. Sorry I saw the first three - starting when I was 14. The last two films were horrible. Lucas blew it and established a new level of mediocrity - and even that's an exaggerated compliment. 150030@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 11:39:54 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/09/104558.php#comment-150026 i was raised on the force, too. however, the last two star wars movies were so abominable that i've completely lost interest in this rediculous franchise. 150026@blogcritics.org Mon, 9 May 2005 11:24:18 EDT