<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <i>24</i> Day 4, 12:00 AM - 1:00 AM</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:55:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jeff</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/07/004828.php#comment-253508</link>
<description>Jon,

Heh, yeah, I&#039;ve wondered if a couple things here and there were politically motivated. But for the most part, the show doesn&#039;t try too hard to gore anybody&#039;s ox.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">253508@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:55:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jon</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/07/004828.php#comment-252967</link>
<description>Excellent recap fellas! Now I&#039;m not sure if the writers in 24 have a good sense of humour and just there for the laughs. 3 things stood out;

1) There was a delay getting info on this nuke as it was destined to be de-armed under the nuclear proliferation act. Anyone spot any propaganda here??? The Bush administration withdrew the United States from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, pressed forward with the deployment of a national missile defense system (a latter day version of &quot;Star Wars&quot;), dropped nuclear disarmament negotiations, and proposed the development of new U.S. nuclear weapons. All since 2000 &amp;ndash; not too shabby.

2) hahhahaha &amp;ndash; the whole Amnesty inter... I mean global thing &amp;ndash; I wonder if the inmates at Guantanamo bay see 24 and are wondering where their lawyers are??

3) At the end of this show in Australia, a brief low down of what&#039;s to come is given. The (acting) American president is depicted as a danger to himself and country, a person who can&#039;t complete coherent sentences and makes bad decisions. Hello?? Where did they get the inspiration for this one??

Sorry about the all very political observations &amp;ndash; I wonder if the writers really were taking the piss or believe what they write??
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">252967@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:22:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian Gongol</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/07/004828.php#comment-158220</link>
<description>Thanks for identifying the &quot;Jefferson City, Iowa&quot; error.  There&#039;s definitely no &quot;Jefferson City&quot; in Iowa.  Though Jefferson, Iowa does have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffersoniowa.com/menuOpen.php?menuId=8&quot;&gt;168&#039; bell tower&lt;/a&gt;...maybe there&#039;s a hidden nuclear silo underneath.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">158220@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 16:46:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeff</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/07/004828.php#comment-151937</link>
<description>you&#039;re welcome!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">151937@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 22:41:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/07/004828.php#comment-151804</link>
<description>Wow -- this is some recap. 

Thanks Jeff!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">151804@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 17:36:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>