REVIEW

A Quick Reaction to Hitchhiker's

Written by David Dylan Thomas
Published May 02, 2005

Where is the magic? I don't know. It's certainly a competent retelling of the story, with numerous shout-outs to fans of the book and BBC series. The song "So Long and Thanks for All the Fish," is a charming touch, but doesn't seem quite as inspired as it should be. In fact, the whole film feels that way. There are some very, very funny moments, but overall it feels like a shadow of what it represents.

The casting is strong, too, but forced into a relatively quick retelling of the story, there's not much time for character development (although there wasn't all that much in the book, to be honest). Adams and co-writer Karey Kirkpatrick do a good job of maintaining the original structure and key plot points of the novel. The reverence for the late, great author's work is clear.

The inclusion of the guide's entries (and retro look of their presentation) is probably the strongest and most unique aspect of the film. Still, in the end, there's something sort of on-target but without resonance about the whole thing. Can't quite put my finger on it. Still, I recommend it for fans of the book. Actually, I'd be very curious to see the reaction of someone unfamiliar with the series.

David Dylan Thomas is a Philly-based writer/filmmaker who opines voraciously about dem pictures what move on the screen at DavidDylanThomas.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
A Quick Reaction to Hitchhiker's
Published: May 02, 2005
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Comedy, Video: SF
Writer: David Dylan Thomas
David Dylan Thomas's BC Writer page
David Dylan Thomas's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by David Dylan Thomas
Video: Comedy
Video: SF
All Video Articles
David Dylan Thomas's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 2, 2005 @ 15:03PM — NancyGail [URL]

Want to see, need to read the book.

#2 — May 2, 2005 @ 16:08PM — The Theory

to an extent I agree... though it becomes a lot better on repeated viewings.

I honestly think that if they had more time to film and edit (they only started, i think, in June-ish of '04) it would have been a lot stronger and probably done a better job of capturing something.

As it is the movie is a fair addition to the Hitchhiker cannon...

#3 — May 3, 2005 @ 15:44PM — Damien Newton

Much like there is no point in trying to remake the BatBoy Musical a second time, the first time was perfection; there was no need to make a Hitchiker's movie. The BBC series was perfection.

#4 — May 3, 2005 @ 17:14PM — Tom French

i never read the book, but saw the movie. I felt like when someone tells a funny story that you don;t know all the details about. it looked like it should be funny, and I did laugh at bits, but I don;t really feel like I got the whole thing. Especially not like the guy who was laughing hysterically in the movie theatre. Martin Freeman was the reason I sw it, because I liked The Office so much. I could see myself checking the book out now.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/28938)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments