The Quite Large Red Book
Published April 13, 2005
I'd read originally this morning that the Labour Party Manifesto (the Red Book), wasn't available as a pdf, but just a moment looking on the web site and there it was. Or rather, here it is.
You will need to be patient in getting it though, it took a few minutes for me, no doubt just the hundreds of thousands of people eager to read it. Or perhaps its just all the bloggers.
I can say one thing for certain and that's that it wasn't published for those with an eyesight the far side of 40 years old. I needed to crank up the magnification in Acrobat to 150% to read it comfortably, something a little harder to do with a physical book, but then many with eyesight problems aren't going to be reading it online either.
Blair's blurb at the beginning sounds as if it might come out of any major corporations Annual Report, all bright eyed and bushy tailed.
Moving on into the detail and we get some of the aspirations. On Employment."Our goal is employment opportunity for all - the modern definition of
full employment." Yes, not an actual job just the opportunity for a job. On a day when the unemployment figures went up by 20,000 (let alone Rover and the Longbridge area), which means the overal total topped a million and a half this doesn't seem such a wonderful aspiration.
And Education (Our Number 1 Priority, can't help thinking about United Airlines every time I see that), the aspiration is to "We want
every secondary school to become a specialist school and existing specialist
schools will be able to take on a second specialism. Over time all
specialist schools will become extended schools, with full programmes
of after-school activities."
Now, perhaps I'm just being a little dim but if every school is a specialist and every school should have more than one specialism doesn't that mean they're generalist? I have to be honest the whole idea of school specialisms leaves me cold and with the feeling that if there's a speciality over there then there is a lack of opportunity and provision over here.
All in all Labour seem to have dropped actual promises in favour of aspirations. This might be more honest, but it also means they can say, "But that's what we tried to accomplish we didn't say we would".
- The Quite Large Red Book
- Published: April 13, 2005
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Politics: International
- Writer: theSliver
- theSliver's BC Writer page
- theSliver's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
So, are British anti-war Leftists voting for the Lib-Dems? Or holding their noses and voting for a Blair-led Labour? Or sitting out this election? Or are they (gasp!) voting for the Tories?
Well those on the Left (in our terms) would be more likely to vote Respect where they're standing. The Lib-Dems are attempting their three card trick of not being on the general political spectrum and emphasising their differences to everyone else on the planet.
Certainly, they're the only party advocating raising taxes and apart from the flurry about a local income tax replacing property taxes it goes down without much of a murmur. That may be because no one expects them to move much beyond the 24% water mark.
I think a large number of Labour voters will stay home, we will still end up with a Labour government but on a very low turnout, perhaps as low as 55%.
I doubt the Tory vote will move very much at all, which will mean that UKIP's vote will have collapsed.





aye, one of the things about blair that grates the most with me, is his love of meaningless jargon over plain ol' English.
Anyone would think he'd been learning a thing or two from best buddy Bush...