<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Britain Election 2005 part 2 - the Conservative manifesto</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:21:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-139368</link>
<description>thanks JD, very cool stuff, nice to hear about other countries for a change - and they even speak English there!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">139368@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:21:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-139361</link>
<description>i already &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/06/172328.php&quot;&gt;did&lt;/a&gt;


sorry for the confusing title.
I may do updates in a few days&#039; time.  Also might look at some of the smaller parties such as the Green Party or whatever its official name is</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">139361@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:06:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by lorenzo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-139115</link>
<description>very good read, look forward to the blogcritic of labour. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">139115@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:33:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-138120</link>
<description>I did not see it mentioned in their manifesto.
As for my own opinion on poll tax, all I really know about what happened before was that it triggered riots.  Hence, I cannot really decide either way as I don&#039;t have any details to deicde on.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">138120@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:00:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael Brown</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-138115</link>
<description>is there a case for returning to a Poll Tax</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">138115@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:24:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-137523</link>
<description>yes, i comment as jadester but write as jon.  It&#039;s a bad habit, but still a habit
I know it was a joke.  Usually when I use the
=+)
smiley it&#039;s cos i&#039;m not being serious</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137523@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:36:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Temple Stark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-137505</link>
<description>Yeah I know. Twas a joke.

er so jon are you also jadester? I&#039;m confused.

Where&#039;s David Steele and the other David when you need them. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137505@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:00:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-137498</link>
<description>yes, hopefully later today.  Even labour (that&#039;s the blighty version =+) had alot of stuff to go through despite &quot;only&quot; have a few documents.  This is by no means a full analysis but hopefully in simply picking out the bits that catch my attention, i&#039;ll be able to, in turn, catch the attention of some other people.
Of course, there&#039;s also a liberal smattering of my own opinions on things in these.  But then, in politics, i believe it&#039;s impossible to be 100% neutral.
And yes, next up are the lib dems...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137498@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:04:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Temple Stark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-137472</link>
<description>You spelled labor wrong

:-)

Most Americans, er .. many .. think the Labour Party, because of Tony Blair, is very much like The Republican Party. Ooh, they&#039;re so wrong and it&#039;s why Blair is going to lose, I believe (good or bad). If they stopped and even thought a moment they&#039;d realize that Margaret Thatcher was a member of the Conservative Party. While overseas she is most remembered for working with Ronald Reagan, in Blighty I think her reign is most remembered for the miner&#039;s strike, the Brighton bombing and the Falkland War, in no particular order.

Thanks for the dual posts. Are you going to try and define the Lib-Dems? Good luck on that. :-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137472@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:06:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/04/07/191212.php#comment-137451</link>
<description>excellent post Jon. much to muse upon. not that i&#039;d be voting for these sons a bitches.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">137451@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:21:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>