Will the new Gladwell theory stick?

Written by emdashes
Published April 01, 2005

The whole world is tipping and blinking because of rock star MG, and who am I to deny his powers of encapsulation? Since he's been manufacturing theories faster than the JustBorn factory makes Peeps, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that there's a brand new one ready to blow the minds of Oprah and C.O.O.s alike. I'll see if I can convey it coherently to you — I feel so tippy already! (Tipping-pointy takes too long to say, and it always makes me think of the Steve Martin poem: "O pointy birds, o pointy pointy/Anoint my head, anointy nointy.")

OK, this is the gist. The blinky thing works pretty well for initial relationship judgments, e.g. I know a louse when I see him. But after you've been involved with someone for a while, it's awfully hard to tell if it's going to last; we're all prone to (as he likes to say) mind blindness. Leave it to Gladwell to pinpoint a technique we've all been using but didn't know it: discerning commitment via concrete physical signals.


This isn't the body language code we had so much fun with in the seventies. It's simpler than that (but, this being Gladwell, infinitely more complex as well, natch). Say you're wondering if the person you've been seeing is interested in more than a casual affair. How do you know? Drawing on cutting-edge neuroscience and psychology once again, Gladwell breaks it down instinct by instinct. You might be tempted to trust your sweetie's gaze, for instance; eyes may be windows to the soul, but they have deceptively patterned curtains. Same goes for his visage generally, not to mention those theatrical exhalations and comforting hugs—charisma ain't devotion.


Basically, you can't really go by the way someone acts toward you; ultimately, humans need to judge each other by a single standard, another "adaptive unconscious," if you will, and it may be a surprising one. It's the ultimate thin-slicing: the locus of affection is in oscular delivery. I can't do it justice, though; you'll have to take it from him, particularly because, somewhat surprisingly, he repeatedly expresses concern that his message is not being properly listened to.


Look for Gladwell's newest epidoozy on the special table at superstores near you — judging from the galley, it's going to be as massive as the other two. It's called Shoop...catchy.


The Spin Myth [New Yorker, via Gladwell.com]


All this and more is at www.emdashes.com, where New Yorker junkies never have to feel alone.

emdashes.com has a New Yorker fetish and doesn't blush about it.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Will the new Gladwell theory stick?
Published: April 01, 2005
Type:
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Books: Nonfiction, Culture: Humor and Satire, Music: Classic Rock and Oldies
Writer: emdashes
emdashes's BC Writer page
emdashes's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by emdashes
Books: Nonfiction
Culture: Humor and Satire
Music: Classic Rock and Oldies
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/27627)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments