When Will People Learn to Boycott the SAT?

Written by bhw
Published March 16, 2005
page 1 | 2 | 3

So if you want to design a good timed, pop-quiz essay question, one that can assess writing skills [rather than content knowledge or level of interest in an abstract concept], ask students to write about something relevant to their lives. Try to find a topic that all students can easily relate to their personal experiences, something they've read or studied, or something in their collective cultural experience.

Here's another question from the recent SAT. This one gets closer to the mark:

Take a stand on whether majority rule is a good way for groups to make decisions.

Not bad. All students have some sort of group experience to draw from: school, family, work, sports, orchestra/band, clubs, the list goes on. They can quickly use one of those group experiences as an extended example that supports their thesis. So this question can be used to assess writing ability, to the extent that you can assess writing ability with any timed test.

I would argue however, that with a 25-minute pop-quiz essay, you can't do much more than evaluate someone's ability to write an answer to an unknown topic in 25 minutes. That's not the same thing as being able to evaluate overall writing ability or predict success in college courses. Then again, I'm a stickler for designing assessments that match their own goals. I also prefer that people interpret assessment results according to the skills the assessments are actually measuring, instead of what the reviewers wish they were measuring.

In the end, essay tests should help students succeed, not push and baffle them into failure. So if we're going to give essay tests, we need to give students:

  • More than one question to choose from

  • More than 25 minutes to write the essay [like two 40-minute sessions over two days, one for a first draft and one for a revision, with a night in-between for reflection]

  • Questions that are relevant to the vast majority of h.s. students, but not so broad that they're based on abstract ideas like "creativity" that some graduate-student-test-writer came up with while navel gazing

  • Questions that don't have hidden subject matter requirements [i.e., "Using an example from American literature...."]

Reasonable people know that a 25-minute test should never be used in the college admissions process in the first place. College placement, yes — might this kid need a basic writing course, or can s/he go right into freshman composition? — but not as a graded test that can affect college admissions. But since the writing test is here, the College Board should at least design a good, fair test.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
When Will People Learn to Boycott the SAT?
Published: March 16, 2005
Type:
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Education
Writer: bhw
bhw's BC Writer page
bhw's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by bhw
Culture: Education
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 16, 2005 @ 14:55PM — Lisa McKay [URL]

Not to mention the whole cottage industry that's grown up around helping kids prep for the test. When my son was a junior in high school we must have gotten five or six flyers in the mail every week from these places, and they're hideously expensive classes (and I don't think you get a money-back guarantee). When we made the rounds of colleges, one of the things we heard from every single admissions officer was that the high school transcript was way more important in the long run than the SAT scores, which likely means that success in high school, along with a reasonably challenging curriculum, is more predictive of success in college than how one did on a standardized test.

#2 — March 16, 2005 @ 15:02PM — Travis [URL]

I couldn't agree more. It's the same argument I make against the transition our nation's classrooms are currently making toward "test teaching" instead of more creative teaching.

I don't know what's going to happen in 20 years when creative thinking is missing from the workforce because of the insane amount of importance placed on standardized tests.

#3 — March 16, 2005 @ 15:06PM — bhw [URL]

Lisa, you're exactly right. Colleges and unversities have said exactly what you said: that high school records are much better predictors of college success than the SAT ever was.

Also, a couple of the articles I linked to talk about the big business of SAT prep, as well as how it's so expensive that underprivileged kids have no chance of taking a class. So we have another gap in opportunity based on socio-economic status. The 'haves' get test preparation, the 'have nots' don't.

From the Business Week article: "Test prep and tutoring services in the U.S. took in an estimated $702 million in 2003, and that's expected to grow to $960 million this year, according to Eduventures."

Essentially, every time the SAT changes its format, the test prep companies rake in extra profits.

What a racket.

#4 — March 16, 2005 @ 15:08PM — bhw [URL]

Travis, I'm in complete agreement on the standardized testing craze taking over public schools. As with the SAT, it will get worse before it gets better, sadly.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/26824)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments