Your Money is Not Enough
Published March 09, 2005
Your donations alone do not and can not change the direction of the country. It is not the average supporter of $10, $25, or even $50 that enables movements for social change, environmental justice, civil liberties and civil rights to succeed. The startling thing you learn when you really get into the thick of liberal advocacy, is how dependent progress really is on those it claims to be against.
If you take a hard look at the financial disclosure documents of the great nonprofit champions of the causes you support, those who battle racism, sexism, poverty, pollution, infringements on your rights, etc. and you'll find that they alternately suckle at the teat of the same corporate behemoths that they are all too often must battle. The most ardent consumer advocates apply for funds from the mercilessly mercantile, the purest enviros take money from current or former polluters of the highest order, and all but the rarest of groups are forced to follow the dollar trail. And those corporate barons, their descendents and inheritors, dictate how those resources are used.
Of course, the organizations we support try to find funds that enable their missions, look for independent and string-free dollars, and have some discretion to do what they feel is best. But as is true in so many areas of human endeavor, those with the money make the rules. Since you and I do not really give that much or use our time to support the causes we believe in, nonprofit agenda-setting organizations must fund their efforts as they can.
Here in America, at least, that means that all too often the advocates of the causes that we passionately believe in must follow the agendas of those who really do not share our beliefs. That means that change will be at the margins. That means that progress will forever be a distant goal.
So if you really feel that we have fundamental rights that should not be infringed upon, that preserving a healthy environment for our children is the moral course, that everyone should have a chance to succeed and no one should starve in the richest country in history, that people should come before profit, or that real change is needed for our society to be just, then you have to do more. We have to join the movement for change, not just send a few dollars each year and then ignore the problems. We have to give a bit more, yes, but not just of our money.
Vital organizations and movements are built through the efforts of volunteer activists who give money, but who also organize, who learn about and vote conscientiously, who spend their money and their time responsibility, who talk to their friends, neighbors, family members, contacts, and political leaders about how best to create the society that we want to live in and want our children to live in.
- Your Money is Not Enough
- Published: March 09, 2005
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: OnBackground
- OnBackground's BC Writer page
- OnBackground's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Out of curiosity, what does the phrase "environmental justice" even mean?
Dave
Great piece, cuts to several fundamental truths in America.
Question: how does one go about volunteering for a local organization? Is it simply a matter of calling up / visiting and saying, "I'd like to offer x amount of my time to your cause?"
Dave - Your question is leading/tilted with the word "even" in it.
Yes Eric, I'm skeptical of the term. But specifically because of that I'd like to know what it means. Does it mean that everyone gets an equal share of US coal reserves?
Dave
"no one should starve in the richest country in history"
And no one does...
nalle, please stop showing off your prejudices so blatantly. i'm sure a smart guy like you knows perfectly well what the phrase means - andf if not, you should. try a search if you're REALLY stumped...
RJ: "The onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a "two-tier labor market" in which those at the bottom lack the education and the professional/technical skills of those at the top and, more and more, fail to get comparable pay raises, health insurance coverage, and other benefits. Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households...Population below poverty line:12%"
sure hope you're right...
>>nalle, please stop showing off your prejudices so blatantly. i'm sure a smart guy like you knows perfectly well what the phrase means - andf if not, you should. try a search if you're REALLY stumped...<<
Actually, I've never seen it used before, and it seems so oxymoronic that I had to ask. I've seen 'Social Justice' and I certainly understand that. But how can justice be applied to a system of nature?
So I looked it up as you suggested. It's supported and advocated by some wacky liberals, but I found out what it means - and I'm for it. Never even thought there was such a movement with a name and everything, but living in a rural area I see evidence of what they're fighting every day and it's a worthy cause.
Dave
dave, glad to have been of service.







It is hypercapitalism, which becomes fascism. Who ever has the money makes the rules. Sad, really.