<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Hirokazu Kore-eda's <i>Nobody Knows</i>: Watching the Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:11:00 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Alan Dale</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/03/08/192450.php#comment-127806</link>
<description>Thanks. An interesting idea about the city. It&#039;s sort of like nature: abundant but indifferent to your survival.

I meant to comment on something you said in the Million Dollar Baby thread, but the static got too loud.

You wrote with respect to structuralism: &quot;The old &#039;there are only six stories, and seven characters&#039; argument - a terrifying thought to any writer, if true.&quot;

First, I&#039;d say that no critical idea is &quot;true.&quot; They&#039;re just ways of organizing your thoughts and reactions to the primary material. And all ideas, all distinctions, break down at the edges (e.g., the distinction b/w periods, novels and romance, prose and poetry, fiction and non-fiction). Some break down at the center! The odd thing to me about the Million Dollar Baby hubbub was that I was essentially being called a pretentious, know-it-all prick by people who were insisting there&#039;s a right way and a wrong way to practice criticism, which I would never dream of saying. Criticism is just a way of prolonging the pleasure of the primary work it addresses--to each his own. (And don&#039;t get me started on the worthlessness of arguments ad hominem.)

Second, structuralism radically reduces the number of genres but not characters. I love applying to random works Northrop Frye&#039;s idea that there are only four planes of action in fiction--heaven, the earthly paradise, earth, and hell--and all storytelling involves either descent or ascent from one level to another. But even if you accept this as a premise, character, which seems to derive essentially from allegory, that is, from the personification of human virtues and vices, is far from being as limited.

Thanks again for the comment.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">127806@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:11:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/03/08/192450.php#comment-127400</link>
<description>Phenomenal review - the film can also be seen as a paean to cities - silent, brooding, a main character in the film itself. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">127400@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:38:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>