Hirokazu Kore-eda's Nobody Knows: Watching the Children

Written by Alan Dale
Published March 08, 2005

In Nobody Knows four children of different fathers ranging in age from 4 to 12 are abandoned in a Tokyo apartment for unpredictable periods while Keiko, their childish, pleasure-seeking mother, goes off with men. Since landlords won't rent to mothers with very young children, Keiko presents Akira, the oldest, as her only child and sneaks the other three in, two of them inside suitcases. Thus, except for Akira, who buys groceries and cooks, the children have to stay indoors. Even the balcony is off-limits, except for the older girl Kyoko who is mother's little laundress.

To show what children's lives would be like with no adults around to nurture them, or simply to impose order, the director Hirokazu Kore-eda employs a shooting style made up of "edgy" choices--off-center framing, movement in and out of frame and focus, cutting before and after the beat, sequencing of scenes without familiar narrative logic. (The camerawork is by Yutaka Yamasaki, the editing by Kore-eda.) It's a paradoxically quiet expressionistic technique, a virtuosic way to make the audience feel as if we were observing without intruding.

Kore-eda's approach is like Gus Van Sant's in Elephant. In Elephant, however, Van Sant was fighting against his material. You went in assuming he made the movie to explain the attack at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, and yet he was so concerned (and rightly) about merely dramatizing editorial banalities that he developed a technique to show what it must have felt like to be at the school that day not knowing what was coming, i.e., not knowing what someone would want to make a movie about. Van Sant's technique--long, wandering, unbroken takes successively covering the same time without intercutting--was an interesting attempt to prevent his movie from having the center everyone expected it to have. (Unlike the Columbine shooting itself, it's pretty much impossible to have a rote response to Elephant.)

By contrast, Kore-eda's intention and style in Nobody Knows are more smoothly aligned. The point of his technique is to replicate with the inherently intrusive camera what day-to-day life is like for these kids whose plight "nobody" knows about. (It's the opposite of reality TV which is documentary in the simplest sense of being non-fiction but can tell you only what people behave like when they do know the camera is on.)

At the same time, it would be a mistake to think of Nobody Knows as naturalistic. Kore-eda's technique is actually a highly formal and intentional way of making everything feel unobserved, offhand, diffuse. It's a fabulous technique: more consistently than in such great naturalistic works about the suffering of children as Vittorio De Sica's The Children Are Watching Us and Shoeshine, René Clément's Forbidden Games, and the first story in Satyajit Ray's omnibus movie Two Daughters, you're conscious of the visual and rhythmic correlatives for devastating neglect.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
Alan Dale earned a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Princeton University and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He currently works as a corporate tax attorney in Portland, Oregon. He is the author of What We Do Best: American Movie Comedies of the 1990s and Comedy Is a Man in Trouble: Slapstick in American Movies.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Hirokazu Kore-eda's Nobody Knows: Watching the Children
Published: March 08, 2005
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Art House, Video: Drama, Video: Family
Writer: Alan Dale
Alan Dale's BC Writer page
Alan Dale's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Alan Dale
Video: Art House
Video: Drama
Video: Family
All Video Articles
Alan Dale's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 11, 2005 @ 10:38AM — Aaman [URL]

Phenomenal review - the film can also be seen as a paean to cities - silent, brooding, a main character in the film itself.

#2 — March 12, 2005 @ 10:11AM — Alan Dale [URL]

Thanks. An interesting idea about the city. It's sort of like nature: abundant but indifferent to your survival.

I meant to comment on something you said in the Million Dollar Baby thread, but the static got too loud.

You wrote with respect to structuralism: "The old 'there are only six stories, and seven characters' argument - a terrifying thought to any writer, if true."

First, I'd say that no critical idea is "true." They're just ways of organizing your thoughts and reactions to the primary material. And all ideas, all distinctions, break down at the edges (e.g., the distinction b/w periods, novels and romance, prose and poetry, fiction and non-fiction). Some break down at the center! The odd thing to me about the Million Dollar Baby hubbub was that I was essentially being called a pretentious, know-it-all prick by people who were insisting there's a right way and a wrong way to practice criticism, which I would never dream of saying. Criticism is just a way of prolonging the pleasure of the primary work it addresses--to each his own. (And don't get me started on the worthlessness of arguments ad hominem.)

Second, structuralism radically reduces the number of genres but not characters. I love applying to random works Northrop Frye's idea that there are only four planes of action in fiction--heaven, the earthly paradise, earth, and hell--and all storytelling involves either descent or ascent from one level to another. But even if you accept this as a premise, character, which seems to derive essentially from allegory, that is, from the personification of human virtues and vices, is far from being as limited.

Thanks again for the comment.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/26458)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments