Why/Haven't I/Told You?

Written by David Fiore
Published March 08, 2005

Did you know that you could easily spend the rest of your life reading net-musings about Lynch's Mulholland Dr.? Last year, I contributed some words of my own to the tower of babble--but I'm back for more, thanks to Mark K-Punk:

The ‘standard’ interpretation of Mulholland Dr claims that its first two-thirds are the fantasy/ dream of failed two-bit actress Diane Selwyn, whose actuallife is allegedly depicted, in all its quotidian squalor, in the finalsection of the film. This would underscore MD’s striking similaritiesto The Singing Detective, whose complexly-interacting narrativelines are weaved from the fantasies and memories of the convalescentpulp author, Philip E Marlow (Michael Gambon). Yet such a reading isultimately unsatisfactory. As Timothy Takemoto argues, (you have to scroll down to his piece, ‘Double Dreams in Hollywood’) to see the second part of Mulholland Dr as real is inherently conservative in its assumption that there is an unambiguous reality to which we can ‘return’.

Following Zizek, Takemoto suggests that what MD presents is not anexposed ‘reality’ but a ‘grey fog’ of competing, incommensurablerealities, from which desire and will are never extricable. (Anhomologous case is Kubrick’s near-contemporaneous Eyes Wide Shut, which is standardly interpreted as entirely the dream of the protagonist, Tom Cruise’s Bill. What this reading of Eyes Wide Shut has in common with the dominant readings of Mulholland Dris a confidence in the possibility of parsing reality from desire, adistinction which both films disturb, as the very title of Kubrick’sfilm indicates).

Where was Mark back when Charles and I were having it out in the threads? Clearly, I share his hostility to the Wizard of Ozzing of the film. We're a strange species--the only thing we like better than a mystery is a solution (especially a hard-bought one). Unfortunately, the only way to  secure that final-Grail piece is to sell the quest short. You know there's always something missing. You know, because what's missing is "you".

This is the age of the second person singular--and we missed it.

We always do.

Mulholland Dr. is its prophet and encomiast.

Play it. Watch it. Play it again. There's no stopping it, really... Oh sure, life goes on--but there's no shaking that prison-bar pause sign, once you've succumbed to this film.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Why/Haven't I/Told You?
Published: March 08, 2005
Type:
Section: Video
Writer: David Fiore
David Fiore's BC Writer page
David Fiore's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by David Fiore
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/26424)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments