Blogcritics Comments on I'm a B-list blogger

Comment by Dave Nalle on I'm a B-list blogger

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:57:08 EST

>>Well, yer lucky, Dave; I stopped short of posting a shameless, egotistical "plea" for the phone number of a film director who used a font I designed.<< Actually, I would have preferred an email address for someone on his staff, but he's bizarrely reclusive. There's now a lot more to that story, but it will have to be told another day. Dave ]]>

Comment by Shark on I'm a B-list blogger

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:26:58 EST

DaveNalle: "...I admire your humility, Shark." Well, yer lucky, Dave; I stopped short of posting a shameless, egotistical "plea" for the phone number of a film director who used a font I designed. ]]>

Comment by Bithead on I'm a B-list blogger

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:01:48 EST

I've been holding 100-125hpd for nearly 2 years, now. Am I still 'up and coming'? (Sigh) ]]>

Comment by Dave Nalle on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:55:50 EST

I admire your humility, Shark. Dave ]]>

Comment by Shark on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:51:35 EST

"Blogging: pissing graffitti on the walls of some back alley off the information highway." --- Definition by Shark, ca. 2000 "Don't overestimate the importance of an "art" with the shelf-life of warm buttermilk." -- Shark on bloggers egos, ca. 2001 ]]>

Comment by Dave Nalle on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:49:17 EST

Hey, am I supposed to be counting hits on my blog? Cool idea! BTW, I just bought some cool new Pajamas. Dave ]]>

Comment by jadester on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:45:07 EST

i'm right down there at the bottom. But then, my blog is more of an archive of almost all of the articles i've posted to BC. I currently don't really have time to do much more on it (and even if I did, I'm not sure I could consistently write that much) ]]>

Comment by Eric Berlin on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:53:51 EST

I think unique visitors is the best ways to gague how a site is doing. Pair that with return visitors, and you get a pretty good measure. ]]>

Comment by Thad on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:47:58 EST

Cool article. But why does he base everything on hits instead of page requests/page views? I thought the latter had become the standard measurement. ]]>

Comment by RJ on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:01:23 EST

I'm a Z-List blogger! Yea! ]]>

Comment by Eric Berlin on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:25:02 EST

Interesting/good post. I'll be very curious to see the numbers for A, B, etc. one and two and three years out. Sucks that my home blog is not even considered up-and-coming (average about 30-40 visitors a day) but, alas, I only set up shop last November. I get the feeling that if a blogger is consistent, friendly and engaging to new readers, puts out decent content that serves some (or any) kind of need, and sticks around for a period of time, that readership will rise. I'm curious to hear others thoughts on this. ]]>

Comment by Eric Olsen on I'm a B-list blogger

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:13:37 EST

yeay, we are A ]]>