<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on The Simpsons and Religion</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:29:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by chodoboy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-257425</link>
<description>this was totally good for me lolol</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">257425@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:29:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Daryl</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-210622</link>
<description>Yep, here&#039;s the Left Behind writer &lt;a href=&quot;http://leftbehind.com/channelfree.asp?pageid=1150&amp;channelID=175&quot;&gt;Jerry Jenkins talking about the Simpsons&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">210622@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:56:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ronald C McKito</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-209823</link>
<description>Yeah I recently read an article off of the Leftbehind.com website talking about an episode dealing with homer and the apocalypse and the christian site was giving it good reviews.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">209823@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:22:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by neb bubis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-124950</link>
<description>I agree.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">124950@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:30:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Richard Porter</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-124306</link>
<description>First, I thought the comments police already visited my posts.
Second, I&#039;ll keep it straight and thanks for reading my post.  I try to post topics that keep people talking, even if they do not agree with my point of view.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">124306@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:19:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ClubhouseCancer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-124297</link>
<description>RP:
You&#039;ve managed to nail the contentless, anti-intellectual vibe of these kinds of folks, not to mention the funny typos and grammar mistakes, but you should be careful re: personal insults. I know what it&#039;s all about, but not everyone else does, so rather than get the &quot;comments police&quot; after you, I&#039;d watch the &quot;j-a&quot; talk.

Plus, isn&#039;t &quot;Porter&quot; supposed to be Christian?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">124297@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:00:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Richard Porter</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-124270</link>
<description>Clubhouse,

Now who is the hilarious and very funny jack-ass?  Anymore ponderings on the meaning of religion in today&#039;s culture? Maybe you can partake in a discussion about religion and Gilligan&#039;s Island.  I think Gilligan was a scientologist.
And thanks for actually using some two and three syllable words!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">124270@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:48:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ClubhouseCancer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-124269</link>
<description>I think it&#039;s a hilarious sign of the waning influence of religion in American society that religious leaders have taken to (sometimes) praising the Simpsons. They don&#039;t mind their very cherished beliefs being completely, consistently ridiculed, because at least The Simpsons portrays religion as a part of daily life. A ridiculous, hypocritical, fantasy-based absurd part of life, taken seriously only by fools and charlatans, but a part of life.

Sounds like the religious are just happy to be mentioned.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">124269@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:41:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Daryl</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-124265</link>
<description>Thanks Temple!

And DrPat, I do wonder how much of the Simpsons&#039; leeway to deal with religion is because it&#039;s an animated series, and how much is just because the writers are willing to tackle the subject. Both clearly play a role, but in what ratio?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">124265@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:25:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-123960</link>
<description>don&#039;t be bitter about it tho, duke =+)
i don&#039;t use as many expletives as you, but i usually use the odd one in my posts, force of habit i guess.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123960@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:15:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-123958</link>
<description>I guess that&#039;s why the Duke&#039;s posts do not get &#039;launched&#039; on the world:)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123958@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:08:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Temple Stark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-123956</link>
<description>Daryl,

For some reason the phrase Bloodbath and Beyond came to mind. I should watch the Simpsons more often.

Launched this on the world - or at least the part of the world that scours &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advance.net&quot;&gt;Advance.net&lt;/a&gt; for the (family-friendly) cream of the BC Web log.

Here&#039;s the link. Sorry &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.syracuse.com/entertainment/tv/weblog/index.ssf?/mtlogs/cleve_tv/archives/2005_03.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

- Thanks. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.templestark.com&quot;&gt;Temple&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123956@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:05:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-123401</link>
<description>I recall an interview (perhaps with Al Jean?) in which it is stated that The Simpsons went from being criticized early on for &quot;attacking&quot; religious institutions to now being a show widely praised for consistently displaying religion as a factor in American (or Springfield-ian) life. 

What a little-engine-that-could The Simpsons is. I hope it never stops chugging.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123401@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:40:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/28/064818.php#comment-123386</link>
<description>It&#039;s hard for TV writers to come to grips with religion or the lack of it. Only in an animated environment could it happen - no one will egg Homer&#039;s house for playing a self-aggrandizing minister or (almost) marrying his sister-in-law to a woman.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">123386@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:10:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>