The Butterfly Effect DVD Review

Written by Matt Paprocki
Published February 26, 2005
page 1 | 2

As always, the sound options are phenomenal, including a 5.1 EX and a super-rare DTS ES 6.1 mix. When the audio gets a chance to work (basically during the time travel sequences) it's great. Voices fly around the sound field, the LFE gets plenty of work, and it all follows the camera movement. There are a few minor instances during the rest of the film that show off some nice separation in both mixes, although it's fairly standard stuff the rest of the time. (****)

All of the special features are contained on the director's cut of this dual-sided disc. Things start off with a commentary from the co-directors, Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber. Again, they only comment on the director's cut. The theatrical release is left unspoken on.

The first feature is a 9-minute glimpse into the actual science of the Butterfly Effect called "Science and Chaos Theory." It's all in plain English, explaining the basics and providing examples in case you still don't understand. It gives the movie a slight basis in reality.

"History and Allure: Time Travel" spends thirteen minutes with the concept of moving through time while giving a short history on movies that feature the topic. Some movies, like "Back to the Future," are dissected. It also covers just why people find the concept so fascinating. It's well worth watching after the film is over. The "Fact Track" is a usual Inifilm feature that subtitles the film with oddball facts about the current scene along with other pertinent information.

"Creative Process" is the longest featurette clocking in just short of 18-minutes. It's mostly owned by the directors who discuss the idea, how it came about, how to execute it, etc. They also talk about how personal the film is to them. Good stuff, much like all the extras here.

"Visual Effects" is one of those self-explanatory little features. Sixteen minutes are spent explaining how the time wipes came to be (including a few examples of what didn't work) and other assorted shots. Discussing those would be spoilers. Five deleted scenes clock in at about 3-minutes and have an alternate commentary track if desired. The set rounds off with a storyboard gallery, DVD-ROM stuff, and a trailer. (****)

The movie could be based on a story by Ray Bradbury (soon to be a movie in itself) called "The Sound of Thunder." There, a group travels back in time to the dinosaur era, step on a butterfly, and all sorts of stuff goes wrong in present day. It's the same basic premise here, just focusing on one person.


page 1 | 2
Matt Paprocki is the former reviews editor for Digital Press. The deep game collection, which spans nearly 30 systems and 2,000 games, lines his walls for research purposes. Matt strives to bring credibility to video game journalism, and to aid the industry in becoming respected with all forms of entertainment media. He currently freelances for GameArgus.com and MultiPlayerGames.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Butterfly Effect DVD Review
Published: February 26, 2005
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Drama, Video: SF, Video: Suspense and Mystery, Video: Thriller
Writer: Matt Paprocki
Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
Matt Paprocki's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Matt Paprocki
Video: Drama
Video: SF
Video: Suspense and Mystery
Video: Thriller
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 26, 2005 @ 21:31PM — Aaron, Duke De Mondo [URL]

great review Matt. i have to say, i found the film utterly awful. Incredibly enjoyable, though, as only the truly awful can be.

#2 — February 26, 2005 @ 23:42PM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

Ok, there are rules. You can't post a comment like that without giving a reason. I totally bought the premise and got sucked right in. Going on movie logic, it works.

#3 — February 27, 2005 @ 14:11PM — Aaron, Duke De Mondo [URL]

It wasn't neccesarily the thinking behind the film that i found risable, more the utterly shitty, shambolic, vacant application of such. Nobody had a clue how to convey any emotion of any sort. It played the same game as Aronofsky's Requiem For A Dream, ie, every tragedy piled on top of the last one just made me laugh at the absurdity of it all. How much more tragic can it get??? It was hilarious. it had all the substance of an especially shitty pop promo. and everyone seemed to think they were acting in Dawsons Creek or something. Even Eric Stoltz couldn't save it from utter gut-busting unintentional hilarity.

#4 — August 17, 2005 @ 09:36AM — dan

i agree that the particulary tragic circumstances the protagonist Evan sees himself in are nearing comical, however i found them more frustrating; the way it sometimes looked to all 'be right' in the flashbacks and some act of 'fate' would ruin everything and we would have to see a 20min consequence and explanation of it all. Still a good film though.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/26042)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments