<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Shallow, Selfish Schmuck:  Afterthoughts on Hunter S Thompson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:31:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by monsieurb54 on Shallow, Selfish Schmuck:  Afterthoughts on Hunter S Thompson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/26/165916.php#comment-734153</link>
<description>I&#039;m really stunned that some people are actually debating whether HST is &quot;libertarian or not libertarian.&quot; I thought the very idea of libertarianism was one of open-mindedness and escape from the false dichotomy of leftwing-only/rightwing-only. Seriously.

What it sounds like is that he was essentially libertarian except he was probably more left-wing and possibly socialist on economics/private property (as a matter of fact, tons of green party/socialists are basically libertarians with the exception of economics/private property. Were they to change their views on that, they&#039;d essentially be complete libertarians). I would still call him nearly a true libertarian. One single thing does not &quot;void&quot; that.

And WildBill above said he &quot;wasn&#039;t libertarian&quot; because he lived his life recklessly, and seemed to infer that if you don&#039;t &quot;live&quot; libertarianism in all facets of life, you are &quot;not libertarian.&quot; What kind of bullcrap is that? If that&#039;s true, then Ron Paul is not libertarian because he practices Christianity, a COLLECTIVIST RELIGION. Seriously, nothing else need be said. 

As you probably noticed from some of what I said above, I&#039;m thoroughly sick and tired of the dumb and mindless anger on both sides: socialists/Greens angrily decrying libertarians as &quot;capitalist scum&quot; and what-have-you and likewise libertarians discouting people like HST for being 99.9% libertarian and not 100%. Seriously, there is NO definitive defition. At all. Socialists and libertarians, like it or not, have tons in common. And this is coming from an anarcho-capitalist (me).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">734153@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:31:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger on Shallow, Selfish Schmuck:  Afterthoughts on Hunter S Thompson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/26/165916.php#comment-700687</link>
<description>Brother Rose- I thank you kindly for the testimonial.

Still, I could use a good neck wringing, Grendel.  I&#039;ve surely got it coming.  But beyond that, do you have any counterargument as to why I&#039;m wrong about HST other than whipping my ass?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">700687@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:18:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Christopher Rose on Shallow, Selfish Schmuck:  Afterthoughts on Hunter S Thompson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/26/165916.php#comment-700636</link>
<description>Grendel, you&#039;re not the first to feel that way and won&#039;t be the last. Fortunately, Al is a giant amongst men and his neck is the size of a giant redwood, rendering him almost invulnerable!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">700636@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 07:41:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Grendel on Shallow, Selfish Schmuck:  Afterthoughts on Hunter S Thompson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/26/165916.php#comment-700632</link>
<description>Al, it&#039;s a shame I can&#039;t get my hands around you&#039;re scrawny neck.....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">700632@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 06:45:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Black Dog on Shallow, Selfish Schmuck:  Afterthoughts on Hunter S Thompson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/26/165916.php#comment-639360</link>
<description>Bravo!  He was a first rate wretch and you nailed it!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">639360@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:51:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>