<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Callahan's Con - Writer's Con</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:39:23 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Tony Dalmyn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/20/133415.php#comment-120628</link>
<description>Starship Troopers glorified military culture and incidentally showed how military training creates strong social forces within the military.  There was the idea that full citizenship was denied to anyone who had not been the military which made it a military elitist society, but I thought there were further elements that suggested a fascist state - the emphasis on the corporate good of the state, a disrespect for dissent.   I wondered if Heinlein wasn&#039;t fooling around to see how attractive he could make that kind of society sound to readers.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">120628@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:39:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/20/133415.php#comment-120535</link>
<description>Good review of Robinson&#039;s latest Callahan novel!

I wouldn&#039;t call Heinlein&#039;s &quot;Starship Troopers&quot; fascist, though - it is more &quot;militarist&quot; or &quot;elitist&quot;. Few novels in Heinlein&#039;s &quot;future history&quot; would qualify for the fascist tag, except maybe the future theocracy of &quot;Revolt in 2100&quot;. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">120535@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:43:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>