Anti-Widescreen... Cult???
Published February 15, 2005
Back in college, I was assigned a research paper to write. This was just a few years ago and the catch was that none of the research could be done on the internet. I knew exactly what I wanted to do but still had to cite sources. Since my topic has very little written in book form, it was a little irritating. I didn't understand why exactly the internet was so bashed by professors. Now I can firmly say I do.
See, there's this nut job out there named Bernie Farber. His website was up until a few days ago (it's been archived here), spreading hate in the most literal terms about widescreen movies/TV. His statements are not just completely off the wall and way over the top about the subject, but horribly, horribly wrong. In fact, he's kinda funny.
Right from the start this genius claims to be objective and factual, which actually means he's completely out of the loop (or slightly insane). He claims that widescreen is censorship and that you're unable to enjoy a movie if has been "letterschlocked," in his own terms. Where exactly did this guy come from? He's one of the many who have yet to figure out that those "black bars" are not cutting off part of the screen, but presenting the film in the correct aspect ratio. After viewing screen captures like this, how could you possibly believe anything else? Maybe he's blind?
He then proceeds on some absurd rant that HDTV's and their different widths are evil. Maybe if he watched a widescreen presentation on a widescreen TV, those "black bars" wouldn't be there. Why would that be? What exactly is the problem there? His most hilarious statement is that widescreen fails to follow the Americans with Disabilities Act. Maybe if people like him would just flat out shut up, giant widescreen TV's would be the norm and those who suffer from poor vision would have no trouble seeing what they need to... in widescreen.
Still, Mr. Farber makes it perfectly clear that he is, in the purest form, a true moron by failing to back up his arguments. He stopped responding to E-mails back in 1999 by anyone supporting the "opposition." It's a shame that word even has to be brought into such a ludicrous argument, especially since people who enjoy watching ALL of their movies have "nothing legitimate to say." No, you're right Mr. Evil Dictator. We don't have a clue.
If you enjoyed my rant on Farber, check out the always great commentaries from widescreen.org.
If you prefer my own rambling, check out my Widescreen Rant 2004 and 2003.
- Anti-Widescreen... Cult???
- Published: February 15, 2005
- Type:
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Adventure, Video: Comedy, Video: Film and TV Business
- Writer: Matt Paprocki
- Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
- Matt Paprocki's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I couldn't agree more. Perhaps Mr. Farber should investigate some other new technologies, mainly Lasik surgery.
Mr. Farber fails to understand that one of the reasons that digital televisions are constructed with wide-screen is to bring the aspect ratio of movies into the home. That coupled with high-definition make the widescreen, digital televisions one of the newest wonders of the world. Perhaps Mr. Farber prefers to sit back, and remember the good old days. Days when we had three or four channels and damn if you didn't have to get up off the couch to move the rabbit ears so you could see Mr. Cronkite.
Times change. Apparently Mr. Farber hasn't.
Farber is correct, many widescreen films are made
by lopping the top and bottom a 4:3 film.
Who in their right mind would want a view of the
world like that obtained from sitting inside a post box, only those of unsoundmind I would imagine.
Very, very few films are shot that way. James Cameron is one of the few directors who does this, and only on a couple of films. I'd be willing to say 90% of major studio films are shot in true widescreen.








This sounds a lot like the guy who reviewed the Mini-Mac and complained it didn't have a 5 1/4" floppy bay.
Or maybe it's Sendar Argic under his witless protection programme.