The "Reimaged" Battlestar Galactica - Light Years Beyond the Original

Written by Randy Reichardt
Published February 13, 2005
page 1 | 2 | 3

All we know about the Cylons is that they were created by man decades ago, and eventually turned on humanity, destroying them for reasons unknown. The new show's creators (or reimagers?) chose to maintain the look of the original robotic creatures, which I felt from day one looked altogether rather silly, with the red beam of light pulsating back and forth where normally one would find eyes. A small price to pay in exchange for a show of such high quality. Another smart choice: the elimination, at least so far, of the annoying child character, Boxey, who appeared in the miniseries, but is nowhere to be seen in the episodes broadcast to date.

In his Dec 2004 review, Michael King described the new version as "not your father's Galactica", and Matt Shafer followed earlier this month, calling it "the best show you're probably not watching", adding "In only five episodes Battlestar Galactica established itself as not only the best Science Fiction show on television but one of the best shows on television bar none." Both are accurate descriptions of the most pleasant surprise of the 2004-2005 television season. The good news is that after five aired episodes, the Sci-Fi Channel has ordered a second set of 13 episodes. The bad news is, I've lost another hour during the week when I could be doing something else besides watching television!

page 1 | 2 | 3
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The "Reimaged" Battlestar Galactica - Light Years Beyond the Original
Published: February 13, 2005
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: SF
Writer: Randy Reichardt
Randy Reichardt's BC Writer page
Randy Reichardt's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Randy Reichardt
Video: SF
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 14, 2005 @ 02:53AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

All 13 episodes of the first season have already aired in Europe, and are available on the internet. While the series is slightly uneven, and one episode major plot hole in particular is galling*, I'm very glad they're coming back for another season.

* It has to do with how long it take Doc Baltar to detect a Cylon. Which is it -- a couple of minutes or a few hours? Which fits the plot, I guess!

#2 — February 14, 2005 @ 22:35PM — RJ [URL]

I'm interested now. Great review!

#3 — February 15, 2005 @ 00:23AM — Kujo

I've scene all 13 eps (via the Internet), and I have to say that it's easily one of the best sci-fi series in years. Some of the eps were un-even, is specially in the second half, but things picked up at end. Overall, it's a splended series. I love the dark, moody, atmosphere.

#4 — February 15, 2005 @ 00:29AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

"Light years beyond the original" is an apt description. Since the original was cringingly awful, those light years put this one in the realm of mediocre, mildly irritating B-grade science fiction. On a par with Andromeda.

Dave

#5 — February 15, 2005 @ 03:09AM — Carpe Bonum [URL]

Yes, it's a great series. It's a season pass in my TiVo, and I just watched "Alibi."

Thanks for the review. Nice job.

#6 — September 24, 2005 @ 12:50PM — chris mankey

"Light years beyond the original" is an apt description. Since the original was cringingly awful, those light years put this one in the realm of mediocre, mildly irritating B-grade science fiction. On a par with Andromeda.

Dave

No actually it's very very good. What the hell where you watching?

#7 — September 24, 2005 @ 12:58PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

I'm watching a remake of Battlestar Galactica without the campy elements that at least made it amusing and with a whole bunch of bad overacting and incomprehensible plotting.

Dave

#8 — October 21, 2005 @ 14:31PM — Chris mankey

I'm watching a remake of Battlestar Galactica without the campy elements that at least made it amusing and with a whole bunch of bad overacting and incomprehensible plotting.

Most of the acting is understated if anything! As for "incomprehensible plotting" I guess if you're not smart enough to follow along I don't know if it's incomprehensible to anybody but you.

#9 — October 17, 2006 @ 03:24AM — DaveR

Series 3 of BattleStar is very bad and is basically a prisoner/gorillar warfare story, very dark and disapointing. Its like the same people who ruined the Andromeda plot have done the same to Battlestar. Please learn from Andromeda and don't hire the same writers or directors. Andromeda started strong but failed from mid to end and finished in a joke of an ending...

#10 — October 19, 2006 @ 01:30AM — Randy Reichardt [URL]

I would disagree. I think Season 3 has advanced the story considerably, and created the opportunity for the writers to change to focus of the show to almost animal-like survival. It's a bold move, and I find the SE3 episodes to date very compelling. It's also interesting to see some chinks in the Cylon armour, so to speak. It's a great series.

#11 — April 24, 2008 @ 12:40PM — SciFiFan

The original BSG series is VERY GOOD. The re-imagined series to too violent. I've tried watching the series and I can't.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/25472)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments