<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Life Fantastic</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:24:20 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by kirsten</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/11/190532.php#comment-117657</link>
<description>Oops.  Thanks for the heads up Chelseagirl (re: Anjelica and Sofia) - really appreciate it!  And you&#039;re probably right about Owen.  But he&#039;s always so &lt;i&gt;easy&lt;/i&gt; to watch, that&#039;s the thing. 

So glad you guys liked the film as much as I did.  Some of the reviews I&#039;ve been coming across were seriously starting to make me doubt my own faculties.

I reiterate though: I stand by Wes.  This film was a corker.  (As we say Down Under). </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">117657@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:24:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by chelseagirl</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/11/190532.php#comment-117653</link>
<description>I&#039;m so glad you liked the film. I think the clue to why it&#039;s getting strange reviews is in one of the lines from the opening scene of the film -- &quot;I just don&#039;t think they got it.&quot;

BY the way it&#039;s &quot;Anjelica Houston&quot;, and &quot;Sofia Coppola&quot;.

Also, just my opinion but I think Owen works very hard at that Ned character. I think his usual lazy charm is probably &#039;easier&#039;.

 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">117653@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:54:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bryan McKay</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/11/190532.php#comment-117625</link>
<description>Although the critical reviews weren&#039;t too great, everyone I know that has seen the film has absolutely loved it. Granted, this may have something to do with the fact that I attend a liberal college specializing in the arts (Film majors consitute a large percentage of the undergrad population, myself included) where many people have a soft spot (read: undying love) for Wes Anderson. I thought it was a fantastic piece and it ranked right up there with his other contemporary &quot;classics.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">117625@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:10:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joel Caris</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/11/190532.php#comment-117619</link>
<description>I think Life Aquatic is probably a hard movie for a lot of people to like, but I loved the hell out of it, personally.  Of course, I&#039;ve loved everything Wes Anderson has done, so I&#039;m certainly biased.  But still, it was a great and completely silly--yet, somehow in a dry way--movie.

It certainly was more ridiculous than his other movies.  The humor is just . . . well, sillier, as I already said.  It worked fine for me, but it is something of a departure.  I wouldn&#039;t put the movie up there with Rushmore or Royal Tenenbaums, but it&#039;s still excellent.

Possibly my biggest problem with the film is that I didn&#039;t get enough from the relationship between Zissou and Owen&#039;s character.  It just never seemed to hit quite the right emotional notes to me and at the end--well, that ending didn&#039;t hit me as hard as it seems like it should have.

But it was still a terribly entertaining movie and quite funny to boot.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">117619@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:28:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>