Scarborough: Rome Wasn't Burnt in a Day—Bipartisan Complaint from a Congressional Insider

Written by DrPat
Published February 11, 2005
page 1 | 2

Lobbyists, media pundits and his fellow revolutionaries are not spared, either. Scarborough draws parallels between his experiences in Washington, and his dealings with vindictive frat boys on the University of Alabama campus, determined to preserve their lock on the student government.

...if I were charged with the responsibility of starting a superfraternity for the ages, my first two recruiting targets would be George W. Bush and William Jefferson Clinton. Bush would be in charge of pledge recruitment, and Clinton would be set loose on sorority row to set up weekend parties.
Scarborough seems to be telling us that our Congress spends like a drunken sailor when one of two conditions are met: Democrats have a majority in Congress, or the White House and Congress are both Republican. In evidence, he lists recent and historic pork-barrel spending, corporate welfare and sneaky riders to popular bills that drain the veins of taxpayer funds. Consider what happened after September 11, 2001.
One depressing example came... while the World Trade Center's ashes were still hot. Soon after September 11th, Congress passed a $318 billion defense bill in response to the national challenges created by the terrorist attacks. Nearly $10 billion was tacked on to the September 11th bill by members of Congress hoping to bring a few extra bucks back to their home states. According to Citizens Against Government Waste, members did this by tacking on "riders" to this crucial bill... [Emphasis mine.]
There is a scene at the end of the movie Protocol, where Goldie Hawn's character Sunny Davis fixes the foreign service bureaucrats with a steely eye and says, "People get the government they deserve—from now on, I'll be keeping my eye on you." Scarborough's conclusion is straight out of Sunny Davis' philosophy.
You have a duty to hold your elected representatives accountable and to let them know you are watching their votes. And if they don't shape up, you will do all you can to send them packing.
Otherwise we can expect the debt to continue to grow, and the focus in Washington not to be good governance, but gaining, retaining and exercising power.

page 1 | 2
DrPat Beard 1996 DrPat is the blog signature used by an old coot who hoards books, dances Argentine Tango, cooks a mean venison chili, and is happy to be along for the sag while my spouse does a marathon bicycle ride. All that is in my spare time — and my work life is classified...
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Scarborough: Rome Wasn't Burnt in a Day—Bipartisan Complaint from a Congressional Insider
Published: February 11, 2005
Type:
Section: Books
Filed Under: Politics: Law and Rights, Books: Politics and Affairs, Books: Nonfiction, Books: History
Writer: DrPat
DrPat's BC Writer page
DrPat's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by DrPat
Politics: Law and Rights
Books: Politics and Affairs
Books: Nonfiction
Books: History
All Books Articles
DrPat's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 13, 2005 @ 21:37PM — Eric Berlin [URL]

It's really amazing how both parties now basically ignore the debt burden. There's a billboard in New York City that keeps a running tally of the nation's debt, then, for our benefit, tabulates "Your Family's Share." When I was a kid in the 80s, I recall the figure being about $57,000 per family. The last time I was in town it was much higher -- something in the $80,000 range.

Nice review as always, DrPat.

#2 — February 13, 2005 @ 22:12PM — DrPat [URL]

Yes, it's the principal tocsin in Scarborough's book, that 7.5 trillion dollar burden.

He mentions the debt clock and how it was turned off during the economic rebound following the Republican Revolution in 1994. And then it needed to be turned back on as the "revolution" fell apart under the pressure to get reelected, to elect George W. Bush in 2000, to reelect the President in 2004....

IMHO, it gives credence to his warnings when he is willing to ladle opprobrium on both "D" and "R" Congress critters!

#3 — February 14, 2005 @ 00:18AM — Scott [URL]

I might have to read this one. I do live in his former Congressional district and all...

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/25375)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments