<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Portishead To Reunite</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:30:05 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by mrbenning</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/09/074933.php#comment-116845</link>
<description>Thanks for that note. I&#039;d been following Portishead&#039;s official site for years. It would have very sparse details about them being in the studio, but never anything conclusive. It&#039;s good to see that they&#039;re working on something new.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116845@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:30:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/09/074933.php#comment-116818</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;After looking at Beth Gibbons&#039;, Portishead&#039;s singer, site, it&#039;s become even more clear that the band is unlikely to ever record together again.&lt;/i&gt;

As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/news/05-01/21.shtml&quot;&gt;Pitchforkmedia reported&lt;/a&gt; several weeks ago, Portishead is working on a new album, due in stores later this year.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116818@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:25:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>