<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on TV Premiere DVDs</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:05:30 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116198</link>
<description>Matt,
I stand by my liking of the concept, maybe they didn&#039;t choose the best titles, but that&#039;s besides the point. 

As to you&#039;re points:
1. I don&#039;t think the cost was too much, I picked them up for about 4 bucks each and they came with a 5 dollar rebate if you buy the season, I think that&#039;s a good deal, much better than those premiere disks for Monk and Dead Zone.

2. I don&#039;t think it was a waste, but I agree, they should have stuffed them with trailers and such.

3. I feel this is just erroneous, there are a lot of people who watch their TV through TV on DVD, I have picked up series based on others recommendations that I chose not to watch on TV&lt; others only buy the season sets so they can watch at their own pace. Either way I think this is a worthy attempt at testing the market.

Maybe the structure will change if done again, maybe they marketer&#039;s are reading this and gaining ideas as to how to adjust the strategy, either way I like the concept. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116198@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:05:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Temple A. Stark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116121</link>
<description>Kung Fu. Best TV show ever. (well top 3.)

Completely awesome.

Let&#039;s not get this confused with, what was it &quot;Kung Fu Returns&quot; in the late 1990s. Not the same thing at all, though it had a  good undercurrent of the same feeling.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116121@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:19:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116110</link>
<description>I thought these were a terrible idea. I was going to write up something when I first found them, but I must have forgot. Look at it this way:

1. You&#039;re paying for a company to advertise to you. These discs cost too much. They should be no more than a $1.

2. Wouldn&#039;t it make sense for the studios to cram these things with trailers for related shows/movies? It seems like such a waste to only put one or two episodes on a disc.

3. Who doesn&#039;t know if they want the Flinstones on DVD? If you&#039;ve never seen it, you really don&#039;t watch enough TV to warrant the purchase of TV-DVD.

Just my $.02.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116110@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:58:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116106</link>
<description>Lost would be ideal for this sort of thing, I believe that Best Buy did a freebie a while back for the first episode of 24 S2.

USA did it for Monk and Dead Zone, but they weren&#039;t the 5 dollar variety, they were asking 15 for the episode, which to me is a bit steep.

I hope to see these cheapie previews again in the future.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116106@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:54:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dietdoc</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116105</link>
<description>DrPat:

I agree - this is a masterstroke for marketing TV collections on DVD. I loved &quot;Kung Fu&quot; - &quot;Quickly as you can, snatch the pebble from my hand.&quot; and the also classic:

&quot;What will you do, grasshopper? Answer: &quot;Wander.&quot;

I would love to see some of the current shows on limited, affordable DVDs. 

HBO ruins their possible profits for this sort of DVD &quot;try before you buy.&quot; The wonderful, if extremely profane &quot;Deadwood&quot; Season One is rerunning now in lead up to Season 2. I would have jumped at the Season 1 DVD collection, but now I have almost seen all of Season 1 so why bother?

Cheers,

Ron</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116105@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:50:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116083</link>
<description>On SuperBowl Sunday, a &lt;em&gt;Monk&lt;/em&gt; marathon on TBS played all the best episodes - if you watched any of them, you got a real sense of the show.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116083@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:02:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mrbenning</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116073</link>
<description>They did this with Monk, didn&#039;t they?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116073@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:44:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/02/07/072827.php#comment-116065</link>
<description>For some shows, this seems like it would be a great idea. &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt;, for example, is a show that seems to grab you from the first episode -- or not. 

But &lt;i&gt;Gilligan&#039;s Island&lt;/i&gt;? I&#039;m not sure a few episodes would convince me of anything.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116065@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:08:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>