<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on ProgAid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:45:37 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Marty Dodge</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-113458</link>
<description>I shall tell you loads more...wait for the review. It will be coming soon. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">113458@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:45:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-113395</link>
<description>Never heard of RWPL; tell me more...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">113395@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:44:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Marty Dodge</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-113393</link>
<description>Wow, impressive. BTW: Tim you heard of a band called RPWL? Their latest release is stunning.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">113393@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:39:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-113391</link>
<description>Update from Jon (formerly of Karnataka, now of The Panic Room), who was laying down recordings over the weekend.

First, the single will indeed have mellotrons on it!  Second, there are so many people involved, there may be four seperate versions of the song, each featuring different people.

No word yet of the release date.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">113391@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:29:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111741</link>
<description>very clean and sharp distinction Tim, and best wishes to the proggers on this project!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111741@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:42:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111732</link>
<description>Before this gets bogged down in a futile argument about semantics, I don&#039;t see &quot;Pretentious&quot; and &quot;Self-Indulgence&quot; being quite the same thing, although it&#039;s quite common for something to be both at the same time.

Self-indulgence is endless noodling solos or triple albums on which only a third of the songs are any good.  

Pretension is claiming what you&#039;re doing is much more profound and significant than it really is. Prog may have been guilty of this in the 70s, but I accuse some navel-gazing indie bands of being guilty of the same thing in the 80s, 90s and 00s...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111732@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:18:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Marty Dodge</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111709</link>
<description>Well I would agree that prog bands no longer do &quot;pretentious bollocks&quot; but can come durn close to pretentiousness quite often. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111709@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:20:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111620</link>
<description>isn&#039;t there a certain amount of pretentiousness inherent in self-indulgence?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111620@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:03:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111617</link>
<description>Eric, Prog rockers don&#039;t do pretentious any more; they leave that to Indie.  Some occasionally still do self-indulgent, especially if they&#039;re called The Flower Kings</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111617@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:53:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111457</link>
<description>if it doesn&#039;t noodle and meander in a most pretentious way I will be offended</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111457@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:04:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Marty Dodge</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/24/175132.php#comment-111448</link>
<description>Why don&#039;t they freaking re-release Hear&#039; N&#039; Aid on CD? I had that album and it was not that bad!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">111448@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:39:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>