Music Review: Jimmy Chamberlin Complex - Life Begins Again

Written by Scott Pepper
Published January 13, 2005

As the drummer for Smashing Pumpkins, Jimmy Chamberlin churned out consistently solid riffs and fills that even today are instantly recognizable to anyone who ever turned on a radio in the 90s. While not particuarly innovative, his style nonetheless became an integral part of the sound of one of the biggest bands of the short-lived grunge era. With Life Begins Again, Chamberlin teams with prolific musician-songwriter Billy Mohler under the less-than-imaginative name of Jimmy Chamberlin Complex to deliver a collection of percussion-based songs equally weighted by hits and misses.

While Chamberlin's drumming is certainly competent, it's hard to build a rock album around a rhythm section. The bass and drums are very much at the forefront of every song, which can make for rather tedious listening, even for the most diehard aficionado. The guitar and keyboards seemed tacked on as almost an afterthought in many of the songs, making the music seem less the work of a band and more like an extended eight-track experiment.

Overall, the album is a tough listen, particularly the instrumentals - but that is not to say there aren't a few stand-out songs. The driving title track is arguably the best on the album, with solid guitar work and a catchy tune. Catherine Wheel singer Rob Dickinson provides grungy vocals that add a bit of spark, and shows up again on the rather conventional "Love Is Real."

In an odd but memorable turn, The Righteous Brothers' Bill Medley turns out an amazing vocal performance with the slow, throbbing "Lullabye," the only song on the album that sounds as if it could have come from Smashing Pumpkins in their heyday. On the other hand, Pumpkins fans who are looking forward to Billy Corgan's vocals on "Loki Cat" are likely to be disappointed, as the driving bass of that track overpowers the singer, and the song itself is flat and forgettable.

The instrumental tracks are best ignored, with the exception of "Cranes of Prey," which is saved by outstandingly heavy guitars that complement rather than compete with Chamberlin's drumming.

It's easy to lump Life Begins Again in with the never-ending string of solo projects gone awry, but the germ of an idea worth pursuing still manages to creep through even the most mediocre sections of the album. One certainly can't give it an unqualified recommendation, but if Chamberlin and Mohler keep at it, there's a chance that any sophomore effort could supercede what amounts to an essentially sub par debut.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Life Begins Again Life Begins Again
Jimmy Chamberlin Complex
Music,
Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness
Smashing Pumpkins
Music,
Mary Star of the Sea Mary Star of the Sea
Zwan
Music,

Music Review: Jimmy Chamberlin Complex - Life Begins Again
Published: January 13, 2005
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Rock
Writer: Scott Pepper
Scott Pepper's BC Writer page
Scott Pepper's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Scott Pepper
Music: Rock
All Music Articles
Scott Pepper's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 14, 2005 @ 09:52AM — DJRadiohead [URL]

While Chamberlin's drumming is certainly competent, it's hard to build a rock album around a rhythm section.

I would argue most great rock albums START with the rhythm section.

Good review, though. I am curious about this album because I always liked Chamberlain's drumming.

#2 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:09AM — Tom Johnson [URL]

I agree on both points, DJRadiohead. Chamberlain's a great drummer. And I've always said that if your drummer sucks, your band's going to struggle. A good drummer can play down to a lesser band and even encourage greatness in them, but a crappy drummer will drag a band down because they have to play down to *him*.

I had to stop listening to the White Stripes because of Meg's horrible drumming and lack of ability to keep good time. At times it was like listening to the Shaggs' drummer.

#3 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:13AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

wot's wrong with the Shaggs' drummer?

;-)

#4 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:15AM — DJRadiohead [URL]

Tom,
the only good thing I can say about Meg White's drumming is that she has the good sense to stay out of the way (but you are right, her timekeeping is quite dreadful). Larry Mullen Jr. (while better than Meg) knows he can't drum, so he stays out of the way. And I like both bands.

Alex Van Halen should take a cue (SOMEBODY, ANYBODY, TAKE AWAY THAT MAN'S CRASH CYMBAL! PLEASE!)

#5 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:22AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

i dunno...what White does fits in perfectly with the whole sound of the White Stripes.

it's a big, loud, sloppy, bluesy mess. fulla passion & stuff.

they're not tryin' to be King Crimson or anything.

#6 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:29AM — DJRadiohead [URL]

Mark,
I don't disagree that Meg's drumming does seem to 'fit.' But it's still not very good (and yes, I am a White Stripes fan). The songs are still excellent, but a real drummer could breathe some more life into a few of those songs.

#7 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:37AM — Tom Johnson [URL]

Mark: I love the Shaggs' drumming . . . but because it's so horrible - as is everything else!

Meg White, on the other hand, really kills the Stripes for me. I want to like them, but her non-sense of time just irks me so much that I cannot listen. I know it's big, sloppy blues, but she's just too sloppy.

I don't know about Larry Mullen Jr. - what is his status among drummers? I always felt he was a really tasteful, minimal drummer, not a bad drummer. Maybe he's not a technically stunning drummer, but the guy's got a good sense of what's appropriate and intriguing.

#8 — January 14, 2005 @ 11:49AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

interesting.

i didn't even notice that Meg's drumming was suspect.

not sure what that sez about me.

#9 — January 15, 2005 @ 03:02AM — Lono [URL]

as an obsessive rock dork, I regard two as the best drummers in rock. I'll leave out Peart because that is simply implied.

the two greatest living rock drummers are Danny Carey (tool) & Jimmy Chamberlain

#10 — January 21, 2005 @ 14:55PM — Temple A. Stark [URL]

Scott,

I put this one up on Advance.net

It's something to do during my lunch break.

Don't forget to let your contacts know about the promotion there. Hundreds of thousands read it there.

Thanks.


Temple

#11 — January 27, 2005 @ 12:28PM — drews

This was the most horribly innaccurate review I have ever read. I was first confused like others when the reviewer said you cant base a rock album around the rythm section. Secondly, the instrumentals are where this album shines. The complex has created Jazz fusion with a better Rock:Jazz ratio than other fusion groups. When the bass and drums lock into a groove to let the Rhodes take a solo, The Complex create a smooth sound without compromising the rock edge. Plus you got to love the ring modulator on the rhodes. I think The original reviewer should stick to reviewing "American Idol episodes" in stead of showing his incompetence in reviewing real music.

#12 — January 27, 2005 @ 12:54PM — Eric Olsen

I can't address this album because i haven't heard it yet, but I totally disagree tha the msuic on American Idol isn't "real": how much more real can you get than singing, vocally naked, live, in front of 50 million people with everything on the line. that's about as real as it gets.

#13 — January 29, 2005 @ 16:54PM — jdf [URL]

singing, even a cappella in front of millions, is not real music. in fact, lyrics, in general, destroy the integrity of the medium.

it's equivalent to painting a masterpiece of symbolism, then painting the words which give it away right on top of the picture.

you cannot, biologically, combine the lyrics and other instruments in your mind (so long as the lyrics are in your language). all humans (well, all animals) have an inate ability to pick language out of things - the reason people think they hear words in white noise, or when they hear records backwards. have you ever heard a noise, having nothing to do with speech, and thought someone said something? that is because your brain picks language out above all other sounds and if it even resembles speech you will pick it out first.

now, this is not to say that i don't like music with lyrics, because i do. just as i like salvador dali's paintings, even though they're mostly not technically good, in the definition of art. however, i do not look at a canvas with nothing but words on it and see art. i see literature. likewise, singing a cappella isn't really music, it's just poetry with different tones and inflections of the voice (ever heard a beat poet read?).

just my take, anyway.

#14 — January 30, 2005 @ 13:45PM — Eric Olsen

interesing thoughts jdf, I would exactly reverse your theory however, and say that the human voice in song is the most elemental form of music extant

#15 — February 10, 2005 @ 22:19PM — Zachary Lisotn [URL]

Yeah, but no one has even mentioned yet that the songs in American Idol aren't written by the contestants. I would be far more impressed if the contestants performed there own music and lyrics on stage. Then it would be real, but I think something about writing your own music kind of goes against pop music as a genre.

#16 — February 18, 2005 @ 21:01PM — BDM

I think that lyrics add an incredible amount to a song, sure - if a song is written with bad lyrics then i feel it drags the whole thing down, even to the point where it is unlistenable - but with good lyrics with depth and meaning, it can lift it right up - making it more than just the music underneath.

#17 — March 4, 2005 @ 08:52AM — dlevy

Larry Mullin Jnr. not a good drummer!?~You should try listening to 'The Fly' on Achtung Baby or 'Your Blue Room' on Passaengers-simple but fantastic drumming.

#18 — March 4, 2005 @ 09:49AM — JR

jdf: singing, even a cappella in front of millions, is not real music. in fact, lyrics, in general, destroy the integrity of the medium.

Eric Olsen: I would exactly reverse your theory however, and say that the human voice in song is the most elemental form of music extant

Actually, if the voice is singing a wordless melody, there's no contradiction here.

jdf: it's equivalent to painting a masterpiece of symbolism, then painting the words which give it away right on top of the picture.

Yes. Well put.

#19 — March 16, 2005 @ 02:31AM — aaron

Whenever folks dis meg whites drumming it's obvious they dont understand the white stripes purpose. Stripped down garage rock, blues and for that meg is perfect. It's all been done before but the electric blues rock supergroups are more abundant than internet dorks.

#20 — September 9, 2005 @ 18:51PM — I of the Mourning

jimmy chamberlin, then danny carey, then jon theodore, then chad smith, then lars ulrich for invention and sound........

#21 — November 3, 2005 @ 13:37PM — me

tre cool is one of the most overlooked great drummers.

he know how to keep it simple yet u can see he is a mad skilled drummer, and fits every beat and sound to the advantage of the overall bands sound and lyrically he is the frontmans best friend. his drumming style kicks ass in my opinion.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/24226)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments