Rankist Generosity
Published January 13, 2005
Quite often humans do have the power to dictate how others will respond in any given situation. For example, in the case of a man trying to seduce a woman. Most fools recognize that females are the half of humanity who give off signals and indicate whether they are in any way interested in the attentions of a particular slob. Still, any tit who maneuvers into the position of being alone with a tart should realize that he holds the license for the woman's inhibition. All he has to do is issue the license and eliminate any simpering gestures of hesitation or that sickening coyness that some assholes from western nations exhibit around women. Avoid any behaviour that hints at and lets a woman buy into that contrived image of a pure virginal chastity and she will instead opt for that which she really longs for; to be stapled to the mattress with a rigorous and energetic shag.
The world-wide reaction to the tsunami disaster is most striking then, as compared to the response towards the slaughter that continues in Iraq. As succinctly pointed out and asked by Terry Jones (the same member of the Monty Python comedy troupe) in a commentary in the Guardian; what has contributed to such vastly different amounts of attention and monetary aid despite the similar toll in lives? Is it the sudden ferocity of the tsunami? The instant destruction? The belief that perhaps we could have been victims if we had vacationed at a different time and maybe, just maybe those foreign cunts with the strange culture and guttural language in Iraq might just have deserved what they got if only a tiny bit? The lack of media coverage (surely)?
Speaking of Iraq, the Guardian continues to demonstrate why it is the top online newspaper bar none with this account from an Iraqi film-maker in the days after the much touted route of Fallujah by US forces back in November. A bleak, macabre landscape greeted him, soaked with misery, desperation and rage. Most noticeably he asks, where are all the bodies of the insurgents the yanks claimed to have killed? He also guarantees that a civil war will kick-off in the very near future.
Maybe any amount of assistance for Iraq would open our eyes to just how horrific things are there at the moment and would highlight our own culpability in the massacre. Comparatively, our spontaneous and generous outpouring towards the countries affected by the tsunami strengthens our image of a world full of caring and just souls in which we all play an important role.
Cross-posted at: Pistonhips: misanthropic ravings from an expat in Bangkok
- Rankist Generosity
- Published: January 13, 2005
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Finkleman
- Finkleman's BC Writer page
- Finkleman's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
LOL. You said something nice about The Guardian. So much for any credibility you had..
As for the whining about who is giving what for disaster relief, how about the monumental ingratitude of the Indonesians who are insisting that US soldiers there to help out their citizens and deliver aid not carry weapons when going into rebel-infested territories like Ache, and force their women to wear head scarves while handing out food. What kind of government makes head scarves a priority over the welfare of its disaster-stricken people?
Dave
I think there are plenty of nice things that can be reasonably said about the Guardian, but naming it the top online paper certainly reveals a certain predisposition




other than the intemperate lauding of the Guardian and the equivocation of Iraq (a war) and the tsunami disaster (an apolitical act of nature) at the end, super and perceptive job of analyzing the sociology of the post-disaster mentality and the exigencies of expectation - thanks Finkleman!