<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on AF&O's The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:44:03 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis on AF&amp;O&#039;s The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/04/160149.php#comment-116714</link>
<description>Yea to all of that, particularly energy.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116714&amp;itemDate=2005-02-09+00%3A44%3A03&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Natalie+Davis+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116714&amp;itemDate=2005-02-09+00%3A44%3A03&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Natalie+Davis+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116714@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:44:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on AF&amp;O&#039;s The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/04/160149.php#comment-116669</link>
<description>I was late to that one too Nat, nad agree they have a lot of energy, tunes and attitude
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116669&amp;itemDate=2005-02-08+19%3A33%3A27&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Eric+Olsen+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116669&amp;itemDate=2005-02-08+19%3A33%3A27&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Eric+Olsen+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116669@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:33:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis on AF&amp;O&#039;s The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/04/160149.php#comment-116666</link>
<description>A what?

Postscript: Finally got past the hype and listened to the Franz Ferdinand LP. (Hey, I get to it when it&#039;s possible.) Now I know: In retrospect, I should have done a top 11 of 2004. Wotta band!
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116666&amp;itemDate=2005-02-08+19%3A27%3A24&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Natalie+Davis+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116666&amp;itemDate=2005-02-08+19%3A27%3A24&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Natalie+Davis+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116666@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:27:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by a person on AF&amp;O&#039;s The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/04/160149.php#comment-116587</link>
<description>i thought u wer supposed to be givin an addie?
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116587&amp;itemDate=2005-02-08+15%3A21%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+a+person+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-116587&amp;itemDate=2005-02-08+15%3A21%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+a+person+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116587@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:21:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ClubhouseCancer on AF&amp;O&#039;s The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/04/160149.php#comment-106921</link>
<description>You got some great ones, Nat. 
I loved the Loretta Lynn &amp;mdash; it&#039;s on my Top Ten too. 
Andy Bey is a vocal freak for sure, and this is my favorite of his things since he came back a few years ago. Live, he can be really self-indulgent. His voice is soooo rich and velvety, I often wish he&#039;d go easier on the histrionics, and here I think he has. The whole thing&#039;s kinda slow and easy-going, and it suits him.

I thought the Westerberg was disappointing, and didn&#039;t have any great songs. I have now been disappointed in everything this man has done since &quot;Pleased to Meet Me,&quot; and I swear that if he puts out just five more mediocre albums, I&#039;m giving up on him.

RIP Elliott, and I really want to hear the rest of these songs (Smith maniacs say the best stuff got left off!)


<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-106921&amp;itemDate=2005-01-05+11%3A34%3A53&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+ClubhouseCancer+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-106921&amp;itemDate=2005-01-05+11%3A34%3A53&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+ClubhouseCancer+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106921@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:34:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on AF&amp;O&#039;s The Year that Was: Top Music of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/01/04/160149.php#comment-106907</link>
<description>a fascinating, eclectic and very well presendted list Nat, thanks! I am particularly interested in following up on the Andy Bey, which I have not heard
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-106907&amp;itemDate=2005-01-05+09%3A36%3A16&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Eric+Olsen+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2005%2F01%2F04%2F160149.php%23comment-106907&amp;itemDate=2005-01-05+09%3A36%3A16&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Eric+Olsen+on+AF%26O%27s+The+Year+that+Was%3A+Top+Music+of+2004" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106907@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:36:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>