Looking at the French
Published December 29, 2004
The real danger is that too many French intellectuals have illusion of grandeur about France's role in the world. Since the end of the Napoleonic era, France has been in decline vis a vis other European powers. For many French, Napoleon represented their glory day but as the authors note, Napoleon embroiled Europe in two decades of war that killed millions and did very little to advance liberty. He was a dictator in the image of the modern day thugs but for many in France, he was their benchmark of French glory.
As long as America provided protection from the real world threat, many French intellectuals could engage in wishful thinking. The authors write, "One of the saddest realities of French intellectual life during the Cold War was that so many of the country is leading thinkers supported the Soviet Union even after its true nature was widely known." They added, "The French retreat into abstraction, not the murky thickets of structuralism, deconstruction, and post modern language games....was preceded by a wholesale French withdrawal fro the great moral questions for the Day." For many French, the reality of world was replaced by make-believe.
The intellectual fantasy developed during the Cold War has now come to forefront as many in the French communities believe that the United States stand in the way of French goals and have become a de facto enemy. Whether it is attacking American culture or complaining about America hegemony, much of the French intellectual and foreign policy apparatus view American ascendancy counter to their goal of dominating Europe through the EU. France wants to become major players on the world scene through various international bodies such as the European Union and the United Nations.
The fantasy that America is a threat to French interest is illusionary thinking that is also dangerous. America is no threat to French interest and has no desire to keep "France in her place." France wants to run Europe from the Urals to the Atlantic and use the EU as means to get the rest of Europe to support its welfare state as well as its foreign policy objectives. France goal is be the intellectual leader of Europe and use the various international bodies to reign in the United States, even at the cost of losing the war on terror. Chirac's France has already attempted to intimidate the new Eastern European powers when they sided with the United States on the Iraq War and they essentially told the Turkey that the price of EU admission meant no support for the United States in second Gulf War. Turkey is still no closer to joining the EU but France efforts against Turkey at the start of the war certainly forced America to change their war plans.
- Looking at the French
- Published: December 29, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Books
- Writer: Tom Donelson
- Tom Donelson's BC Writer page
- Tom Donelson's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Listed at Advance
I wholeheartedly disagree with this book. They may have gotten a few of the facts right (eg. France not letting the US use their airspace when it comes to bombing Lybia) but the methods and the motivations for doing this are all wrong. The French have never had it out for the United States and their main motivation from before the nintenth century is to counter their old rival Britian. During the French and Indian War we were not Americans but English colonists and the British used Indians on just a grand a scale as the French. French occupation of Mexico had more to do with reversing the shrinking of an imperialistic Empire, and to hold on to the lucrative trade in Mexico (something that America itself has been guilty of- eg. "In the Eagle's Shadow", by Kyle Longley) And that any substancial foothold that France had on North America was either conquored by the British, or bought by the Americans.
France's modern stance opposite the United States might be out of a little jelousy that it is the US and not the French that has their hands in everyone's cookie jar, but mostly what it has to do with is the idea started by French Farmers who are against American's massed produced, geneticaly modified, and heavily subsidized produce industry. And when you compare French history, art and culture to Wal-mart you might get a little sting of loss for the good old days too. I have a degree in History and Franco-US relations and one thing that I cannot stand is a book that just happens to distort the facts for socio-political ends.





The French have always been somewhat of an enigma in their foreign policy efforts - for example, they pulled out of Nato during the cold war which was very strange at the time.
The reality is that the deomcratic countries of the world have far more in common than in differences and need to focus there
Cheers