<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Movie Review: <i>Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:28:11 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Triangle Eyes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/28/093740.php#comment-286476</link>
<description>Terrible. Absolutley(sp?) terrible. The whole story line was changed, events were added. The dissapointment of the century I call it. Please come to my URL.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">286476@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:28:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by lmnylvr</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/28/093740.php#comment-272104</link>
<description>i luv the books (and liam aiken!)and the movie but it kinda ruined the sadness and the way the book really were.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">272104@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:52:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by joe turner</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/28/093740.php#comment-263052</link>
<description>Web 2.0 is very open, but all that openness has its downside: When you invite the whole world to your party, inevitably someone pees in the beer.

These days, peed-in beer is everywhere. Blogs begat splogs -- junk diaries filled with keyword-rich text to lure traffic for ad revenue.

Google&#039;s PageRank is unfairly skewed by profit-driven search engine optimizers. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">263052@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:19:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jordan Lavers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/28/093740.php#comment-258156</link>
<description>I beleive that this movie was ok but it should of been more like the books. Jim Carrey did a good job of Count Olaf but not excellent, he looked exactly like Count Olaf. I think it is unfair how you judged this movie because it is a childrens movie not an adults children don&#039;t care how well a person acted and you may not of thought it was that humerous but children will! and i know this because I am one.You don&#039;t go to serious on children movie because it&#039;s not ment to appeal to you adults but to children. You should not get so critical on childrens movie there made for them not for adults thats why there called children&#039;s movies!!!
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">258156@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 05:29:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/28/093740.php#comment-105744</link>
<description>I was just writing this morning about the tendency of talented comic actors to trend toward better and more serious roles as their careers progressed. Carey has shown amazing talent in classy, complex, and funny films like The Truman Show and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. 

Unfortunately, this looks like a speed-bump for him akin to the awful How the Grinch Stole Christmas.

Has Carey been keeping track of Robin William&#039;s career at all? Learn from the mistakes, man.

Eric Berlin
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Dumpster Bust&lt;/a&gt;: Miracles from Mind Trash
http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105744@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:59:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>