Movie Review: Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events

Written by Scott Pepper
Published December 28, 2004

It would be supremely unfair to compare director Brad Silberling's and screenwriter Robert Gordon's meandering adaptation of Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events to the excellent books from which it is derived, if only because it's hard to say how much of the blame lies with the filmmakers for excising nearly all of the intelligence and morbid excitement from the story of the Baudelaire orphans and how much lies with Jim Carrey's singularly awful performance as the villainous Count Olaf.

Carrey is at his rubber-faced worst here, chewing up the scenery like it's going out of style and relentlessly forcing himself to the center of the film. It is the same shtick we've seen countless times before, only less funny and supremely out of place for this film.

If there is any real reason to see this film, it is the excellent performances of Emily Browning and Liam Aiken, as Violet and Klaus Baudelaire. The ability of these young actors to lend gravitas to the proceedings while the adults around them (Carrey, as well as Meryl Streep, Timothy Spall, and Catherine O'Hara) do little more than mug for the camera is really what makes the film worth watching. Browning and Aiken know exactly what sort of movie they are in, even if the rest of the cast has no idea whatsoever. The youngest Baudelaire sibling, Sunny (portrayed by twins Kara and Shelby Hoffman), fares less well, though it is through no fault of her own. While Sunny's baby talk and gurgles are largely incomprehensible in the novels, her words are subtitled in the film with "clever" rejoinders that are both anachronistic and painfully unfunny.

The only other bright spot among the cast is the inimitable Billy Connolly, who makes the most of his all too brief screen time. Unfortunately, his stellar performance only forces even more unfortunate comparisons with Carrey's ham-handed overacting.

As for the production design, it seems that the filmmakers really wanted viewers to believe that Tim Burton was in some way involved with this film (he was not). The faux gothic sets and generally dark look of the film are appropriate, but the largely soulless direction disappoints on every level, leaving the whole mess to feel far more style (and derivative style at that) than substance.

Younger fans of the book aren't likely to care about any of this, as it appears the movie is really geared toward them, anyway. Older readers are far more likely to take umbrage at the virtual bastardization of the style and story, while those unfamiliar with the books at all are likely to wonder what all the fuss is about. Anyone who cares to find out should simply skip the film and pick up the books instead.

Related posts:

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
Published: December 28, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Books: Children, Books: Fantasy, Video: Family, Video: Fantasy
Writer: Scott Pepper
Scott Pepper's BC Writer page
Scott Pepper's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Scott Pepper
Books: Children
Books: Fantasy
Video: Family
Video: Fantasy
All Video Articles
Scott Pepper's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 28, 2004 @ 12:59PM — Eric Berlin [URL]

I was just writing this morning about the tendency of talented comic actors to trend toward better and more serious roles as their careers progressed. Carey has shown amazing talent in classy, complex, and funny films like The Truman Show and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

Unfortunately, this looks like a speed-bump for him akin to the awful How the Grinch Stole Christmas.

Has Carey been keeping track of Robin William's career at all? Learn from the mistakes, man.

Eric Berlin
Dumpster Bust: Miracles from Mind Trash
http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com

#2 — October 20, 2005 @ 05:29AM — Jordan Lavers

I beleive that this movie was ok but it should of been more like the books. Jim Carrey did a good job of Count Olaf but not excellent, he looked exactly like Count Olaf. I think it is unfair how you judged this movie because it is a childrens movie not an adults children don't care how well a person acted and you may not of thought it was that humerous but children will! and i know this because I am one.You don't go to serious on children movie because it's not ment to appeal to you adults but to children. You should not get so critical on childrens movie there made for them not for adults thats why there called children's movies!!!

#3 — October 28, 2005 @ 18:19PM — joe turner [URL]

Web 2.0 is very open, but all that openness has its downside: When you invite the whole world to your party, inevitably someone pees in the beer.

These days, peed-in beer is everywhere. Blogs begat splogs -- junk diaries filled with keyword-rich text to lure traffic for ad revenue.

Google's PageRank is unfairly skewed by profit-driven search engine optimizers.

#4 — November 13, 2005 @ 16:52PM — lmnylvr

i luv the books (and liam aiken!)and the movie but it kinda ruined the sadness and the way the book really were.

#5 — December 10, 2005 @ 08:28AM — Triangle Eyes [URL]

Terrible. Absolutley(sp?) terrible. The whole story line was changed, events were added. The dissapointment of the century I call it. Please come to my URL.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/23681)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments