<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Most Underreported Stories of 2004</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:32:02 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/174059.php#comment-106525</link>
<description>Don&#039;t forget who introduced the bill to reinstate the draft: Charlie Rangel, D-NY.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106525@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:32:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Paul Roy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/174059.php#comment-106458</link>
<description>Eleanor Clift!! Talk about a liberal who needs to f@#k more. Damn, I wish Pat Buchanon would just jump up and slap her one morning on that McLaughlin Group show.   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106458@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:53:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/174059.php#comment-106452</link>
<description>Eleanor Clift&#039;s list was typically idiotic and ill-informed. Half of her neglected stories were either obvious to anyone who can read a newspaper and didn&#039;t need more exploration or were covered exhaustively in the main stream media.

Your list from the Phillips book is a lot more intriguing, though the draft reinstatement story is a complete fabrication - mostly of left wing bloggers who Michael Moored together unrelated events to come up with a fake conspiracy.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106452@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:31:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/174059.php#comment-106429</link>
<description>I&#039;m just wondering why the story of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Bush&#039;s refusal to attack Zarqawi&lt;/a&gt; isn&#039;t on this list.  More &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2108880&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

When it comes to fighting terror, I would have expected a policy of &quot;preemption&quot; to be a bit more... well, preemptive.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106429@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:42:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/174059.php#comment-106425</link>
<description>Anita,

While you are correct that the draft did not happen in 2004, nevertheless, the furor might have had some role in decision making, and the story itself cited is that the posts on the SSS board were filled, which is true.

What I would object to in the same breath is the term, used twice - &quot;quietly&quot; - that puts a partisan spin on the reportage itself, which is as bad as censorship, IMHO.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106425@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:41:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/174059.php#comment-106423</link>
<description>You do realize that the reason the draft story was underreported is that it&#039;s not true?

Or, rather, it is a collection of half-truths twisted and distorted out of context.  It was a politically-motivated whisper campaign that taken as a whole is false.

Don&#039;t be taken in -- and don&#039;t be party to spreading false Internet rumors and urban legends.  This is one story that it was better to have left  underreported, because it is not true.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">106423@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:04:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>