<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Busted! not as lightweight as they seem</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:22:59 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Andrew Ian Dodge</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/115829.php#comment-105616</link>
<description>Pink is far more pop than Busted!, and far less fun. Actually I know of several musicians who while not necessarily being fans of Busted!, think they have talent for what they do. I would much rather listen to Busted! than anything done by Pink.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105616@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:22:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Leo Leahy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/27/115829.php#comment-105613</link>
<description>Busted are complete POP! I dont care what anyone says, they are POP!!! 
&#039;P!nk is as punk as my little finger&#039; says a thick eyebrowed annoying POP idiot!!! P!nk is not punk no, she&#039;s ROCK! I hate busted. The only fans they have are screaming six year old girls. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105613@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:14:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>