<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on It's December 25th- Happy birthday, Mr Enlightenment</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:24:18 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/25/013541.php#comment-105573</link>
<description>Incidentally, the third book of Stephenson&#039;s Baroque Cycle is titled &lt;em&gt;The System of the World&lt;/em&gt;, an obvious nod to Newton&#039;s work.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105573@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:24:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/25/013541.php#comment-105572</link>
<description>Let&#039;s not forget Neal Stephenson, who has published an entire trilogy about Newton and Leibnitz, with fact and fiction carefully woven together.

I might want to debate you, Al, about the authorship of the enlightenment. Newton certainly saw further and with more depth on some topics, but he was by no means first in the development of science. He lived in an era when quite ordinary and common men were excited over &quot;natural philosophy&quot;, the discipline which would develop into scientific inquiry. 

Newton was still a college student when the Royal Society was formed in London to pursue these inquiries. (Although he would surely be its most illustrious member when he did join.)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105572@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:21:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/25/013541.php#comment-105564</link>
<description>Mr. Barger: well put, and well-crafted lede.

At least as far as films are concerned, I think that the greats do get their shot at &quot;greatness&quot; on the silver screen, though it often takes a while (especially for the good ones).

Take, for example:

- Shakespeare in Love
- A Beautiful Mind
- The Aviator

Pretty good films about some pretty good and innovative minds. I&#039;m sure there are a few more... 

Though I suppose &quot;IQ,&quot; which peripherally involves Einstein in a romantic comedy starring Tim Robbins and Meg Ryan, wouldn&#039;t qualify, eh?

Eric Berlin
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Dumpster Bust&lt;/a&gt;: Miracles from Mind Trash
http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105564@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 02:10:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>