<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Innis Mode and the Internet</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:06:23 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105571</link>
<description>I&#039;m looking at one of the great successes right now: &lt;em&gt;The Glass Harmonica&lt;/em&gt; by Louise Marley. I had bought and read &lt;em&gt;The Terrorists of Irustan&lt;/em&gt; by her, but it was years ago, and I didn&#039;t remember the experience. So:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;small&gt;...for a new pair then, Mr. Franklin, lest you ruin your feet.&lt;br&gt;   Eilish hardly comprehended the idea of going to a bootmaker for boots. Her own dilapidated shoes came from the Rag Fair, like everything else she wore. She stared around at the overfurnished room, the shelves and tables, even the harpsichord crowded with snuffboxes, clocks and figurines... Any single one of these... gewgaws would have fed Dooya and Mackie for a week...&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
See what I mean? You get the flavor of the author&#039;s voice in a very short order.

Put it together with any cover text or excerpt the publisher provides, and you get a very good idea if the book will be enjoyable &lt;strong&gt;to you&lt;/strong&gt;.

I have been burned buying books without applying the Rule of 33 (a recent purchase of &lt;em&gt;Mirror, Mirror&lt;/em&gt; by Gregory Maguire comes to mind), but I can&#039;t think of a time when a book passed the test, then was not at least palatable.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105571@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:06:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105569</link>
<description>I love the Rule of 33, by the way, and plan on using it immediately. I wonder if there&#039;s an equivalent in music: Rule of 8, perhaps, where you listen to the first 8 seconds of the first 8 tracks before deciding whether or not to purchase a CD?

BTW - do you have any examples of supreme successes or failures in using the Rule of 33? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105569@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 03:48:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105568</link>
<description>That&#039;s actually a good question, and one that I had to think about for a little while. A quick look at my book shelf provides me with several answers: 

&quot;Katastrophe,&quot; by Richard Boyll, in which a man is accused of being the reincarnation of Adolph Hitler

&quot;Ballroom of the Skies,&quot; by John D. MacDonald (one of my favorite authors), where a near-future Earth becomes a staging ground for galactic warriors.

&quot;Otherwise Pandemonium,&quot; by Nick Hornby, about a man who buys a VCR that fast-forwards into an apocalyptic future.

So they are stories that have supernatural or otherworldly elements but do not provide a lot of hard science background or detail, as Asimov or Frank Herbert or Orson Scott Card would.

I hope that&#039;s a decent explanation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105568@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 03:43:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105563</link>
<description>I haven&#039;t read any Pynchon, either. I think I subjected a Thomas Pynchon novel to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://paperfrigate.blogspot.com/2004/11/rule-of-33-and-jane-chord.html#comments&quot;&gt;Rule of 33&lt;/a&gt; once, and it didn&#039;t pass muster. (grin)

You have to have a way to filter out what you will probably not enjoy - if &quot;soft&quot; sociological sci-fi trips it for you, stick with it.

What books fit that description, BTW?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105563@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 02:06:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105559</link>
<description>I&#039;m unfortunately one of those people who must have intellectual/scientific/dry non-fiction distilled and buffed up and made pretty and spoon fed to me so that I can appreciate and understand it. On my good days I like to think of myself as a Big Picture or Macro kind of person. Therefore, I can collect the term &quot;Innis Mode&quot; into my mind-trap and hope that it clicks into the correct mode-thought at the appropriate time in future.

Anyway, I&#039;m afraid I&#039;ve not read Pynchon, though his is another name I&#039;ve heard of or seen around. Would you recommend his work? 

In my fiction writing, I tend to often stray into &quot;speculative&quot; territory, which makes me feel as though I ought to be much more ingrained in the sci-fi must-reads than I am at present. Of course, my &quot;sci fi&quot; is entirely on the &quot;soft&quot; or &quot;sociological&quot; side, but that&#039;s really not an exuse, I&#039;m afraid.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105559@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 01:50:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DrPat</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105554</link>
<description>Now that we&#039;re out of the limelight, I can tell you that I would not recommend either Innis or McLuhan as an enjoyable read. Of the two, Innis is slightly more accessible.

If I hadn&#039;t read &lt;em&gt;The Bias of Communication&lt;/em&gt; over the course of a week&#039;s stay in a hospital, I would never have taken it on!

The science fiction writers who have used Innis Mode to create &quot;virtual hyperlinks&quot; in their material make Innis&#039; theories work for them. In a comment about &lt;em&gt;Cryptonomicon&lt;/em&gt;, I talked about Pynchon possibly being another writer who uses Innis Mode.

Have you read anything by Thomas Pynchon? (Gravity&#039;s Rainbow?)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105554@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 01:31:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Berlin</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/12/24/191948.php#comment-105531</link>
<description>Fascinating concepts fostered by this Innis fellow. Reading through your review, I thought about The Roman Empire and the use of paper and writing in the fostering of its empire. I can only think that the Internet will foster empires of communications, though I hold out hope that this will be used mostly for good. 

Though Innis wrote from the standpoint of the mid-Twentieth Century, it seems as though his theories are turning out to be entirely prescient. 

Eric Berlin
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Dumpster Bust&lt;/a&gt;: Miracles from Mind Trash
http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">105531@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:41:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>