Economy: Cautious Optimism for '05

Written by Eric Olsen
Published December 17, 2004
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Irwin Stelzer of the Hudson Institute and the Weekly Standard expressed concerns on Tuesday but is ultimately "cautiously optimistic" as well:

    The president's decision to exclude from tomorrow's White House conclave on economic policy anyone who might raise a dissenting voice, suggests that the meeting is intended more to provide Bush with photo ops than with new ideas on how to cope with the trade and budget deficits, the consequences of the falling dollar and rising interest rates, or continued dangerous reliance on imported oil.

    Unfortunately, the administration appears to think that Karl Rove, the political genius whose knowledge of every district in Ohio contributed mightily to the president's reelection, can also craft a sensible economic program. The decision to run economic policy "out of Karl Rove's hip pocket," says the Wall Street Journal, "sufficed in the first term when tax cutting was the main policy focus, but it isn't likely to work for another four years . . . . Mr. Rove knows a lot, but we doubt he knows how to work out the next Long Term Capital Management failure, much less handle a dollar crisis."

    But look on the bright side. Bush enters his second term with an economy that is growing at an annual rate of around 4 percent. Inflation is tame, and the dollar's downward movement has so far been more of a drift than a plunge. If past experience is any guide, a cheaper dollar might, just might, bring the trade deficit down to manageable levels.

    The budget deficit also might be headed in the right direction. In the fiscal year that ended on September 30 the deficit came to $412 billion, the same percentage of GDP (news - web sites)--3.5 percent--as last year. That compares with forecasts that centered around $500 billion, or a 4.25 percent of GDP. Better still, reliable sources in the government assure me that on current trends the deficit will shrink to about half the current level as the economy grows. Assuming, of course, that Congress and the president finally meet a new expenditure they can do without.

Hee hee, good one.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Economy: Cautious Optimism for '05
Published: December 17, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Business and Economics
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Culture: Business and Economics
All Politics Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 18, 2004 @ 00:38AM — Eric Berlin [URL]

Mr. Olsen:

We call it "tax relief" nowadays, not "tax reduction" or "tax cut."

Reminds me of George Carlin's classic rant on the increased softening of American language to hide what's real. As in... some people be getting more relief than others.

I hope the economy does improve... I really do. But at what price (so to speak)? We're racking up debt at an unsustainable rate. Even the conservative (and sometime blowhard) Joe Scarborough has a book out called "Rome Wasn't Burnt In A Day" which talks about how both parties are in a race to outspend one another. Of course, with Republicans in power across the board nationally, they have the 'splaining to do right about now.

It amazes me that even now, at this late date, the Bush Administration's answer to every problem is tax cut-tax cut-tax cut. Oops... relief. Sorry.

Eric Berlin
Dumpster Bust: Miracles from Mind Trash
http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com

#2 — December 18, 2004 @ 11:51AM — Eric Olsen

excellent points and there is always a battle raging to control and manipulate the language, but I do see the talk about a "tough budget" and no increases in anything other than defense as a hopeful sign

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/23374)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments