Blogcritics: Comments on Ethics and Journalism Part 1

Comment by Aaman

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:50:05 EST

I thought the replies were to be poetic - mine shall be. All language is a code And the reader is the interpreter What of, then, the ethics of the reader? Is online writing the worse because it breaks these fair principles? I draw attention to "The Firebrand and Freedom" which is an interview with a fine writer commenting on writing, the Internet and ethics

Comment by Temple Stark

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:37:44 EST

Whew that top book is 31 bucks for 175 pages. That's a chunk of change there.

Comment by Temple Stark

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:35:50 EST

It's not a code dude. And I'm concerned about the reader, the perception and the reality, not the reporter's psyche. When we're talking about ethics it's the end reader (I can't use the word consumer) that matters. Thanks for adding links Eric (or whomever). I was going to do that today.

Comment by Aaman

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:44:03 EST

I see that I misspelled forsooth I erred indeed it is a misdemeanor by your code

Comment by Aaman

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:42:59 EST

What of bad grammar, to speak of but one failing of poor wrting? Is fiction therefore worse than bad spelling in marring and scarring a writer I am, or have been, and will be guilty.