"Elections" Are Nothing
Published November 23, 2004
Elsewhere, America brought "elections" to Afghanistan and what did that get us?
Afghanistan now has a "President of Kabul" with warlords and Taliban running the rest of the country.
And it's turning it into a narco-state. Last year, Afghanistan provided 75% of the world's opium, earning about $3 billion for the warlords.
This year is going to be worse:
The United States said it expected Afghanistan's illicit poppy crop to jump by an alarming 239 percent over last year with a corresponding potential rise of nearly 75 percent in opium production.
"Current cultivation levels equate to a potential production of 4,950 tonnes of opium," the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) said. "This represents a 239-percent increase in the poppy crop and a 73 percent increase in potential opium production over 2003 estimates."
The office, which is based at the White House, said it estimated poppy cultivation in Afghanistan for 2004 to cover 206,700 hectares (510,767 acres), a massive rise from 61,000 150,734 acres) in 2003 and 30,750 (75,985 acres) in 2002 after the ouster of the country's ruling Taliban militia following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.
[US forecasts alarming 239-percent increase in Afghan poppy crop 11/19/04]
But as the White House tells us, Afghanistan is "the world's newest democracy," so everything must be all right, right?
I mean, they held an "election," didn't they?
- "Elections" Are Nothing
- Published: November 23, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Writer: Hal Pawluk
- Hal Pawluk's BC Writer page
- Hal Pawluk's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
"Put on a happy face!" I think it would be very wrong to do that considering the incredible suffering the Iraqi people are enduring. A serious subject -- the illusionary nature of the 'elections' -- should be treated seriously.
I vaguely recall Haiti getting a new queen. That, with all its pomp and circumstance, was supposed to be a solution to the country's deep, painful problems. The 'elections' in Iraq will likely be just as illusionary.
I'm not Dr. Feelgood, Marc, and you missed about a 100 or so items.
Here's a list of Tude posts (opens in new window).
hey hal,
i gotta disagree with marc's dark, dank, critical panning of your work.
i think you do a great job - your stuff is always informational, your research is thorough and i especially appreciate your counter balance to the right-wing spinmeisters. keep up the good fight!
well wat do u think bout this?
i think ur all tree hugging pussies.
go move to canada if you think our nation is so corrupt.
Thanks, Cur3t.
As far as Marc goes, he's pretty much off my radar.
He seems to consistently miss comprehending the content of posts and will get caught up with some peripheral piece of minutiae or tangential thought, kind of like RJ with typos.
I do my best to ignore those kinds of posts, give them little if any attention and even less value.
BTW the 30 posts I refered to were all that displayed when accessing the "see all posts" link, I'll get back with you after I check the rest.
Oh if I'm "petty much off my [your] radar," why do you almost without fail respond?
Also curious.
Ah, it's fun to see the Left move the goalposts.
First, we heard that elections simply could not happen, and that Bush and his Iraqi puppet were being pollyannas.
Now, the tune they play is that the upcoming democratic elections are moot, because people died to bring them about.
When Iraq becomes a decent, secure, moderate, democratic Arab Muslim state, the Left will decry the situation still, by moving the goalposts to "success" ever more...
Hell will have frozen over "When Iraq becomes a decent, secure, moderate, democratic Arab Muslim state."
Perhaps, but even you will have to admit that things have improved since the last time you visited there.
speaking of moving the goal posts...the right didn't espouse "nation building" until AFTER no weapons of mass destruction were found.
if our job is to act as the world's policeman - ridding the planet of evil and creating "decent, secure, moderate states" - then why don't we invade china next? they murder thousands of helpless infants every year for population control.
Speaking of moving goal posts, RJ, how about the 27 reasons for invading Iraq?
Not to mention the Bush flip-flops on the Department of Homeland Security, the 9/11 Commission and any number of other issues.
As for the "elections never happening," that certainly wasn't me so your post has no relevance to my post whatsoever.
"Speaking of moving goal posts, RJ"
I see you do not deny moving the goalposts. Good for you.
Hell will have frozen over "When Iraq becomes a decent, secure, moderate, democratic Arab Muslim state."
and when it does, I shall happily provide you with a blankie... ;)
This is the grownup's table, RJ - you're over there.









This is OT Hal, but I'm curious.
Do you ever write a post that has a positive spin. Something that you care for? Something you advocate? Something that makes you smile?
Something that is just GOOD and not dark, dank, and critical? If you do it isn't reflected in the 30 posts on this site. Not that I believe you have too, as I say, just curious.
And people call me cynical, geeesh.