<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Star Trek is finally back!</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:22:12 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/21/222453.php#comment-100755</link>
<description>I&#039;d mostly avoided all of last season Enterprise because Star Trek was moving more to a relation with science fiction like &quot;cheese food&quot; has to cheese. The characters were tedious, and the writing was just insulting.

I watched the three story arc with Brent Spiner, and it was better, largely because Spiner gives great villain (and Enterprise really lacked a villain with personality). After all, he took the worn device of &quot;evil twin&quot; on ST:TNG and made it work.

But, subtracting Soong, the rest of them are really riding the interstellar short-bus. Since they have the canon to prop them up, we know none of them are in any danger. Which makes for a series which only aims to pander to fans, not present something interesting.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">100755@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:22:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Justene</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/21/222453.php#comment-100736</link>
<description>This review was chosen for Advance.net. You will be able to find it on newspaper sites including Cleveland.com.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">100736@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:28:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>