http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:23:38 EDT http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181969 Lucky guy! What, no kids yet? ;-] 181969@blogcritics.org Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:23:38 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181932 I really love Elastigirl too, both versions - she kind of reminds me of Dawn, exept for the really stretchy part 181932@blogcritics.org Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:18:03 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181929 Indeed! I thought of at least two rather quirky responses to your last comment, but neither one said anything good about my personal predilections. 181929@blogcritics.org Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:14:54 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181916 i would say the pinnacle of all elastigirl related tomfoolery arrives when she's doing the stretchy thing through the security doors in the last act. hmmm. 181916@blogcritics.org Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:48:23 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181905 Now why is that oh Duke? And is your devotion/admiration for young Elastigirl, early in the flick, with all her prenuptual stretching and such? Or do you prefer the mature "motherly" Elastigirl, with her womanly curves and tender loving affection for those two darling offspring? A guy needs to know these things. 181905@blogcritics.org Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:40:34 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181873 ah, my affections for Holly Hunter are plentiful, i'm sure, but only Elastigirl gets my 2nd place. which is all rather shameful. 181873@blogcritics.org Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:59:52 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181334 Her voice drove me nuts. "I've put my foot down, and counted to three." "Lots of respectable people've been hit by trains." "He's bona-fide" Holly Hunter, exactly my age, a doll, in a heartbeat. 181334@blogcritics.org Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:50:30 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181325 and what of sweet elastigirl.... she is second only to Kirsten. it's a hell of a gap between the two, but still. 181325@blogcritics.org Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:45:20 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-181290 Wow, just saw this flick and was truly entertained! Stunning imagery, great characters, fantastic casting for voices (Holly Hunter is perfect). The second disk had "Attack of Jack-Jack" which is worth the rental all by itself. Too funny, a must see movie for all ages. PS: The "Bennett" above (msg #3) is NOT me. I didn't discover BC until Jan '05. 181290@blogcritics.org Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:10:05 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-128257 How wonderful it is! Today, I had seen the film - "The Incredibles" this afternoon, My father also had seen this film in this evening. This cartoon movie is powered by Disney-Pixar. In this film, I love the people's sensation, scene, bugbears. The scene is so sublime. With the great imagination. 128257@blogcritics.org Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:53:30 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-98582 Nancy, perhaps I was overly glib about the nature of work: I was trying to convey that I am fully aware I have been very fortunate to have such help as to be able to pursue a rather quixotic "calling." I am fully aware that many or even most people have to do what they have to do to pay the bills and find self-expression, -realization, etc., through other means. Thanks. DD, it WAS surprising and raised a number of sophisticated and philosophical issues, which is what I was trying to convey here. I didn't get the sense the movie was belittling the pursuit of excellence by "average" people, since Buddy's scheme involved eliminating his "super" competition and "having his fun" as the lone surviving super, before making his inventions available to the public. If his plan didn't revolve around "super genocide" it would be quite positively empowering and egalitarian, like say, the Internet (smile). 98582@blogcritics.org Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:36:24 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-98574 good point 98574@blogcritics.org Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:24:38 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-98517 Maybe you could warn your readers that you are going to discuss a part of the plot that people who have not seen the movie yet might not want to read. 98517@blogcritics.org Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:44:33 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-98516 I wasn't quite sure where they were going with the whole "if everyone is special, then NO ONE will be" thing. I think that they were trying to dump on the whole "everyone is a winner, no matter who actually won!" attitude that tries to avoid guilt over someone not winning. The problem is, the movie doesn't really convey that--it just looks like it's being snarky about mundanes trying to be great. A better (though more cliched) path might have been to make Buddy be just interested in the money, and not care about what people did with his inventions. I personally was surprised by the movie--you can definitely tell that it wasn't the same group that wrote Toy Story et al. There was some pretty heavy stuff in this one--if it had been anything but a Disney Animated Feature it would have been PG-13. (Heavy both in the sense of dark, and also somewhat sophisticated. I doubt that many of the little kids got the scene where Bob helps the old lady with her insurance claim.) 98516@blogcritics.org Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:41:08 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/14/143341.php#comment-98505 "The Incredibles implies that if we do not do work that allows for the expression and development of our "true natures," then we are destined to be unhappy, disengaged and to take it out on those we care most about, in particular our familes. That's my excuse anyway." "Destined"?! It's terrific if you can find someone to bankroll you, such as a spouse ... but if not, there's no excuse for working at a job you feel is dishonest or harmful, or for disengaging from or expressing rage at one's family. It is possible to do an honest day's work at a boring job, and express yourself in your off-hours. 98505@blogcritics.org Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:06:49 EST