The Incredibles

Written by Eric Olsen
Published November 14, 2004

(click pic for trailers)

We have had no less than six very fine and informative reviews of Pixar's new The Incredibles already (Triniman Chris Beaumont Screen Rant Sombrero Grande Dave Hill Jeremy Chrysler), interviews with writer/director Brad Bird and producer John Walker, and more general info here.

With so much ground well covered, please allow me to make a few disjointed observations.

POTENTIAL SPOILERS AHEAD

Family Dynamics

My wife and I saw the movie last weekend and loved it. We could especially relate to the family dynamics, including "work for the sake of supporting the family" vs. work that is personally fulfilling. While I have indulged my own mythic pursuit of self-fulfillment via self-expression, the fantasy of making the world a better place by imparting to it my pearls of wisdom and providing a forum for my worthy fellow scribes via Blogcritics, she has supported our family by working at "real jobs" while I fiddle and dream. Allow me to thank her publicly here.

The Incredibles implies that if we do not do work that allows for the expression and development of our "true natures," then we are destined to be unhappy, disengaged and to take it out on those we care most about, in particular our familes. That's my excuse anyway. Self-actualization may be the surest path to career success in the long run, but the bills don't stop as these things work themselves out - we all need some bankrolling in that regard. The irony that self-expression requires outside backing is not lost on me.

Big Questions from a Little Head

I saw it for the second time Friday night with my 5 year-old, and she loved it, although, as usual, she had many lines of thought racing around her pretty little mind, deepest of which was, "Why did Buddy turn bad?" "Did he HAVE to?" And, "Why was Mr. Incredible mean to him when he was a boy? He just wanted to help, didn't he?"

Penetrating and sophisticated questions: kids are not dumb OR shallow. Why DID Mr. Incredible dismiss the boy Buddy? It's complicated, just like real life. On the one hand Mr. Incredible was haughty and ego-driven. he worked alone because that was the simplest path to the ego-gratification he saw as a prime perk of the profession of super hero ("soops" as they are referred to in the film - exactly something that would happen in the real world, where we come up with abbreviations and nicknames for anything we deal with regularly, or is important to us). Why share the glory when you don't have to - real super heroes work alone, don't they? (Learning the power of teamwork is the exact point of the second half of the film.)

And yet it wasn't only ego that disinclined Mr. Incredible to encourage a kid to get into the biz: saving the world on an ongoing basis is a massive responsibility and exceedingly dangerous work. Besides being a kid, Buddy had no "natural" super powers (an exploration of the sociology of which is at the core of X-men and is a strong recurring theme in Fairly Odd Parents and Jimmy Neutron) and a super hero life without super hero powers (although the kid is one hell of an inventor, to a degree that might be called "super") is almost certain to end quickly and messily: far more responsible (and, frankly, easier) to discourage the kid entirely than leave th door open to an unfortunate result.

page 1 | 2
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Incredibles
Published: November 14, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Adventure, Video: Animation, Video: Comedy, Video: Family, Video: Fantasy, Video: Romantic Comedies
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Video: Adventure
Video: Animation
Video: Comedy
Video: Family
Video: Fantasy
Video: Romantic Comedies
All Video Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 14, 2004 @ 19:06PM — nancy

"The Incredibles implies that if we do not do work that allows for the expression and development of our "true natures," then we are destined to be unhappy, disengaged and to take it out on those we care most about, in particular our familes. That's my excuse anyway."

"Destined"?! It's terrific if you can find someone to bankroll you, such as a spouse ... but if not, there's no excuse for working at a job you feel is dishonest or harmful, or for disengaging from or expressing rage at one's family. It is possible to do an honest day's work at a boring job, and express yourself in your off-hours.

#2 — November 14, 2004 @ 20:41PM — DensityDuck

I wasn't quite sure where they were going with the whole "if everyone is special, then NO ONE will be" thing. I think that they were trying to dump on the whole "everyone is a winner, no matter who actually won!" attitude that tries to avoid guilt over someone not winning. The problem is, the movie doesn't really convey that--it just looks like it's being snarky about mundanes trying to be great. A better (though more cliched) path might have been to make Buddy be just interested in the money, and not care about what people did with his inventions.

I personally was surprised by the movie--you can definitely tell that it wasn't the same group that wrote Toy Story et al. There was some pretty heavy stuff in this one--if it had been anything but a Disney Animated Feature it would have been PG-13. (Heavy both in the sense of dark, and also somewhat sophisticated. I doubt that many of the little kids got the scene where Bob helps the old lady with her insurance claim.)

#3 — November 14, 2004 @ 20:44PM — Bennett

Maybe you could warn your readers that you are going to discuss a part of the plot that people who have not seen the movie yet might not want to read.

#4 — November 15, 2004 @ 07:24AM — Eric Olsen

good point

#5 — November 15, 2004 @ 08:36AM — Eric Olsen

Nancy, perhaps I was overly glib about the nature of work: I was trying to convey that I am fully aware I have been very fortunate to have such help as to be able to pursue a rather quixotic "calling." I am fully aware that many or even most people have to do what they have to do to pay the bills and find self-expression, -realization, etc., through other means. Thanks.

DD, it WAS surprising and raised a number of sophisticated and philosophical issues, which is what I was trying to convey here. I didn't get the sense the movie was belittling the pursuit of excellence by "average" people, since Buddy's scheme involved eliminating his "super" competition and "having his fun" as the lone surviving super, before making his inventions available to the public. If his plan didn't revolve around "super genocide" it would be quite positively empowering and egalitarian, like say, the Internet (smile).

#6 — March 14, 2005 @ 02:53AM — Creford [URL]

How wonderful it is! Today, I had seen the film - "The Incredibles" this afternoon, My father also had seen this film in this evening. This cartoon movie is powered by Disney-Pixar.
In this film, I love the people's sensation, scene, bugbears. The scene is so sublime.
With the great imagination.

#7 — July 12, 2005 @ 23:10PM — Bennett

Wow, just saw this flick and was truly entertained! Stunning imagery, great characters, fantastic casting for voices (Holly Hunter is perfect).

The second disk had "Attack of Jack-Jack" which is worth the rental all by itself.

Too funny, a must see movie for all ages.


PS: The "Bennett" above (msg #3) is NOT me. I didn't discover BC until Jan '05.

#8 — July 12, 2005 @ 23:45PM — Aaron, Duke De Mondo [URL]

and what of sweet elastigirl....

she is second only to Kirsten. it's a hell of a gap between the two, but still.

#9 — July 12, 2005 @ 23:50PM — Bennett

Her voice drove me nuts.

"I've put my foot down, and counted to three."

"Lots of respectable people've been hit by trains."

"He's bona-fide"

Holly Hunter, exactly my age, a doll, in a heartbeat.

#10 — July 13, 2005 @ 17:59PM — Aaron, Duke De Mondo [URL]

ah, my affections for Holly Hunter are plentiful, i'm sure, but only Elastigirl gets my 2nd place.

which is all rather shameful.

#11 — July 13, 2005 @ 18:40PM — Bennett

Now why is that oh Duke? And is your devotion/admiration for young Elastigirl, early in the flick, with all her prenuptual stretching and such?

Or do you prefer the mature "motherly" Elastigirl, with her womanly curves and tender loving affection for those two darling offspring?

A guy needs to know these things.

#12 — July 13, 2005 @ 18:48PM — Aaron, Duke De Mondo [URL]

i would say the pinnacle of all elastigirl related tomfoolery arrives when she's doing the stretchy thing through the security doors in the last act. hmmm.

#13 — July 13, 2005 @ 19:14PM — Bennett

Indeed! I thought of at least two rather quirky responses to your last comment, but neither one said anything good about my personal predilections.

#14 — July 13, 2005 @ 19:18PM — Eric Olsen

I really love Elastigirl too, both versions - she kind of reminds me of Dawn, exept for the really stretchy part

#15 — July 13, 2005 @ 20:23PM — Bennett

Lucky guy! What, no kids yet?

;-]

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/22197)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments