Government of Business, By Business, For Business - Part I

Written by Hal Pawluk
Published November 14, 2004

That's not quite what the Founding Fathers had in mind, but that's the way it is.

During his first administration, President Bush appointed over a hundred industry lobbyists and lawyers to oversee the industries they lobbied and lawyered for.

Like at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is tasked with protecting the welfare of Americans, not that of business institutions. The Bush administration has turned that on its head:

... investigation suggests the FDA's actions against Canadian imports have been part of a concerted campaign to simultaneously discredit its counterpart agency in Canada, provoke fear among American consumers who buy their drugs there, blunt an exploding political movement among local and state governments to begin wholesale drug buys in Canada and ultimately preserve the inflated prices charged U.S. consumers and taxpayers. [Why We Pay So Much For Drugs Time Magazine subscription] (Story links open in new windows)

Part of the reason for that is Daniel E. Troy, who Bush appointed Chief Counsel to the FDA:

As a lawyer in private practice, Troy repeatedly sued the FDA, arguing that it had only limited ability to regulate drug companies. Troy also represented Pfizer through his firm, Wiley, Rein & Fielding.

At the FDA, Troy still is fighting for causes that benefit drug companies. [When Advocates Become Regulators 05/23/04]

Congressman Hinchey doesn't like that, either:

HINCHEY: FDA'S CHIEF COUNSEL SERVES INDUSTRY, NOT PUBLIC

U.S. Representative Maurice Hinchey (NY-22) today held a press conference to reveal information he has uncovered about actions taken by Daniel Troy, Chief Counsel of the Food and Drug Administration. Taking the counsel's office in a wholly unprecedented direction, Troy has repeatedly interceded in civil suits on behalf of drug and medical device manufacturers that were accused of harming patients who had used their products.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Government of Business, By Business, For Business - Part I
Published: November 14, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Hal Pawluk
Hal Pawluk's BC Writer page
Hal Pawluk's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Hal Pawluk
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 15, 2004 @ 10:52AM — Eric Olsen

yes, but the "business of America is business" - right?

#2 — November 15, 2004 @ 11:09AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

it seems closer to "the business of america is letting business do whatever the hell it wants"

...even if that means adding to the polution problem.

i've never quite figured out what's 'conservative' about this.

the 'Clear Skies Act' is a good example of this.

#3 — November 15, 2004 @ 12:46PM — Eric Olsen

I was joking a bit, but the constant struggle of capitalism is to find the balance between pure profit motive and the greater good

#4 — November 15, 2004 @ 15:39PM — Hal Pawluk [URL]

Eric, my response got a bit long so I've posted it as Government of Business, By Business, For Business - Part II (opens in new window).

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/22222)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments