<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Roll on 2008! Clinton-Obama vs Cheney-Schwarzenegger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:08:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Melanie</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-213797</link>
<description>Perchase Clinton/ Obama &#039;08 bumper stickers! Make it a reality! Contact me to purchase!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">213797@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:08:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-102149</link>
<description>all a matter of priorities: do you want Times Square to be safe for family commerce or do you not? I think such an iconic symbol of NYC is better off &quot;safe,&quot; but I also understand the &quot;sterilization&quot; argument against such a change.

But does anyone really regret the clearing out of those squeegee motherfuckers, spewing saliva and implied menace in equal portions to a populace held captive by traffic lights? I would call their removal one of the greatest liberations of the 20th century.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">102149@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:51:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by  PGX - 13</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-102108</link>
<description>Times Square of the 1970/80&#039;s was sort 
of scary. Dirty, sleazy, vice ridden and
all that but it was a hell of a lot more
interesting and fun. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">102108@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:42:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-102084</link>
<description>hope springs eternal, except for Nader that is (kidding, sort of)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">102084@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:02:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anonymous</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-102051</link>
<description>I hope for Nader/Ceriale in the White House.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">102051@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:48:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy marsh</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95820</link>
<description>Greg - you had to see that place in the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s...Times Square was a scary place!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95820@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:15:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95761</link>
<description>greg! Ha! A namecheck for the duke&#039;s hometown, away over here in the far reaches of blogcritics.org.

It&#039;ll probably make the paper.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95761@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:28:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Greg Smyth</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95755</link>
<description>Guliani has, admittedly cleaned up NYC, but it was with Zero Tolerance (and from what I read at the time) and paranoid fascism.

As for Arnie, I&#039;m fully aware of his current blocking by your &quot;constitution&quot; but there are already serious whisperings afoot that that rule could be amended to allow long term citizens (as Arnie is) to run.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95755@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:20:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy marsh</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95732</link>
<description>Unfortunately, by constitutional law Arnold can&#039;t run for president.  He was not born here.

Guliani actually did a lot to clean up NYC.  I remember going to NY as a kid and not wanting to go to times square, but it really has changed for the better and it was done under Guliani.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95732@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:27:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Greg Smyth</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95730</link>
<description>Guliani slipped my mind.  I&#039;ve never understood his remarkable perception turnaround post-9/11.  From what I could figure out across the pond he was perceived as an evil evil man for most of his term as Mayor.  But (and to be honest I was partly joking about 2008 contenders) Schwarzenegger has the potential to reel in the traditionally centre-left as well as the Republican faithful.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95730@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:19:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy marsh</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95727</link>
<description>Guliani, but he hasn&#039;t said yea or nay.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95727@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:11:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Greg Smyth</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95726</link>
<description>Well, you *do* live in Ballymoney! (j/k)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95726@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:11:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Greg Smyth</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95725</link>
<description>Didn&#039;t realise that Cheney had ruled himself out.  What other Republicans are likely to go for 2008 then, people?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95725@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:09:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95703</link>
<description>- The Duke looks out the window. &quot;shit, it IS war-torn out there!&quot; -

heh</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95703@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:19:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael Walsh</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95684</link>
<description>Oh I hope not</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95684@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:46:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jb</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/11/03/033116.php#comment-95571</link>
<description>Cheney&#039;s made it clear he will never run for any other office.  One of his strengths as VP -- no future political motives.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95571@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 04:36:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>