<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:52:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94591</link>
<description>I&#039;ve reminded of a line from the novel &quot;Interface&quot;.

&quot;Wubba wubba wubba wubba wubba wubba wubba wubba...&quot;.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94591@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:52:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jack e  jett on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94571</link>
<description>is the &quot;mission accomplished&quot; bush photo....buse was using the old straps around the thighs for bulge enhancement.  

the bulge on bushes back during the debate?  well,  it is not really a bulge that interest me.

he does have a great ass, but i think it is padded.

jack e. jett</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94571@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:21:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Victor Plenty on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94510</link>
<description>At last, a plausible theory to explain all the available evidence. Thanks, deano!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94510@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:54:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by deano on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94474</link>
<description>Well you are all wrong.

The bulge is real - haven&#039;t you ever seen The Puppet Masters?  It&#039;s aliens damn it!!

Under that carefully tailored suit is some kind of parasitic alien critter controlling the President of the United States.  This explains everything...the weird off the cuff remarks, the horrid inability to speak in coherent sentences, the complete lack of common sense, the missing WMD...

They&#039;ve probably got half the government now....Run you fools! Run for your lives!!!!  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94474@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:59:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by curt on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94443</link>
<description>yeah, right andy, bush would never cheat and then lie about it...

...except when he jumped to the front of a waiting list of 500 guys to get in the guards...

...or when he was promoted to 2nd lt. right after basic, skipping officer training school...

...or when he was pictured wearing a ribbon 2 years before his group ever received such ribbon...

...or when he failed to report to dannelly air base in &#039;72 for ACTIVE reserve, as ordered...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94443@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:17:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy marsh on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94418</link>
<description>I would think that the president could get a better &quot;device&quot; than one you or I could buy at radio shack...just a thought...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94418@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:31:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bhw on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94414</link>
<description>From the Salon article:

&lt;i&gt;How can Nelson be certain there&#039;s some kind of mechanical device beneath Bush&#039;s jacket? It&#039;s all about light and shadows, he says. The angles at which the light in the studio hit Bush&#039;s jacket expose contours that fit no one&#039;s picture of human anatomy and wrinkled shirts. And Nelson compared the images to anatomy texts. &lt;b&gt;He also experimented with wrinkling shirts in various configurations, wore them under his jacket under his bathroom light,&lt;/b&gt; and couldn&#039;t produce anything close to the Bush bulge.&lt;/i&gt; [emphasis mine]

Does wrinkling up shirts at home pass the scientific method sniff test?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94414@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:23:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bryan on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94409</link>
<description>and the tailor that works on alot of Presidential suits has also come out and said what you see is rather normal in a good suit when the arms are crossed.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94409@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:08:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94403</link>
<description>I have evidence to show that the &quot;BULGE&quot; in Bush&#039;s flight suit during the dreaded &quot;Mission Accomplished&quot; photo-shoot was none other than Blogcritics own most garrulous, right-wing commentor.

I will refrain from identifying him specifically, but in a later photo taken shortly after he had emerged from Bush&#039;s pants, he is shown wearing a blue dress with a suspicious &#039;stain&#039; just below the neckline.

*It&#039;s all true.





*&lt;I&gt;confirmed by Drudge AND the Washington Times!&lt;/I&gt;



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94403@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:57:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bhw on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94402</link>
<description>I just like this thread because we get to talk about Bush&#039;s bulge.

Heh.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94402@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:49:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Winston Smith on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94397</link>
<description>bhw,

Right--we&#039;d have to have info that showed that this is roughly what such &quot;wires&quot; look like...and it wouldn&#039;t be that hard to have somebody put one on, put on a suit jacket, and then have pix taken and enhanced.

As for bad tailoring...we can test that hypothesis by asking tailors.  Even if we don&#039;t know WHAT it is, a tailor might be able to rule out bad tailoring.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94397@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:37:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bhw on Bush&#039;s Wire  or:  Does This Tinfoil Make Me Look Fat?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/29/073644.php#comment-94393</link>
<description>I&#039;m not sure what to think, either. There are a couple of shortcomings in the physicist&#039;s analysis, or at least in the article&#039;s coverage of it. One is that he had, I believe, only one camera angle from which to obtain images of &quot;the bulge.&quot; So I wonder what the analysis would have shown in a photo taken from Bush&#039;s back left in addition to his back right. 

Also, the article doesn&#039;t mention what the obvious ridge is that runs down from the rectangular shaped bulge. Is that another wire? I would think they&#039;d have to account for what it was to successfully refute the bad tailoring theory. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">94393@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:33:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>