<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Julianne Moore in <i>Laws of Attraction</i> and <i>The Forgotten</i>: "Do I <i>look</i> happy?!"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:44:53 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Alan Dale</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-122536</link>
<description>I think I can &quot;agree&quot; in some sense with both of the last two posts, though mb isn&#039;t going to like this &quot;interruption&quot; of Moore&#039;s career any more than my original one: the problem with Moore is that she cares far more about her art than she does about the audience&#039;s enjoyment of it. The exception is Laws of Attraction, in which she lets loose with an amazing blend of skill and instinct. I kept rewinding little moments just to relive the kick I got out of her expressions and gestures and vocal tricks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122536@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:44:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-122517</link>
<description>So I guess I&#039;m the only one who finds her pompous, creepy and irritating?

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122517@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:15:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mb</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-122457</link>
<description>Your not serious thinking your interruption of Julianne Moore is accurate. The two films that she&#039;s been chastise for, you think are her better performance?  If you want to write a lengthy article about an actress then maybe next time you should do some research on what motivates the actress.  Julianne Moore has publicly stated that she does not want to be a &quot;movie star&quot;, she wants to be an actress.  She does not want to be a larger then life character that saves the world, she simply wants to do stories about real people.  Which she has done quite well.  
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">122457@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:30:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Alan Dale</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-93822</link>
<description>Thanks for all the comments. I feel a little guilty b/c Moore IS clearly talented and dedicated, way above average, plus she seems like a nice person. That said, I wish she could let loose more the way she does in Laws of Attraction. Is she really comfortable being naked on film or is it just that she does it if it fits her concept of the role (which is a way of not being in your naked body while it&#039;s being filmed)? I just can&#039;t see her shaking it in a movie for the hell of it.

As for Magnolia: I&#039;m not a Tom Cruise fan. He&#039;s a hard-worker, with lots of energy and focus, but he&#039;s strictly &quot;product.&quot; My favorite participants in that movie were Henry Gibson, Melinda Dillon, and the frogs.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">93822@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:54:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by visualsimplicity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-93798</link>
<description>I never thought of Moore&#039;s acting in that way, but yeah, she does sort of have that restrained (maybe nervous) chuckle going. I&#039;m going to have to disagree with Sadi and agree with you, Alan, on her job in Magnolia. However, I&#039;m going to agree with Sadi on Tom though. I can&#039;t argue this point enough, but I thought he was completely robbed of the Oscar for his role in that film. As good as Michael Caine is, I felt Tom did much better that year. Oh well.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">93798@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:01:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by sadi</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-93689</link>
<description>Alan , thx for this. I&#039;ve always admired Moore&#039;s incredible beauty and you describe that well. I actually thought The End of the Affair was a really good adaptation, but that&#039;s okay. It was true to the book and the chemistry between Fiennes and Moore struck me as quite real and believable - she&#039;s very comfortable with herself nude and that&#039;s sexy to me. but that said, i see what you are saying about her holding back a bit - that sounds true enough. I thought she was magnificent in Magnolia, as was (incredibly) Tom Cruise who did a remarkable job. 

Thx for this - as a fan of Moore, it gives me a lot of information and other films to see as well. 

Cheers,

Sadi </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">93689@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:47:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/24/082411.php#comment-93637</link>
<description>excellent job Alan, very subtle and thorough analysis of Moore, I learned a lot - thanks!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">93637@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:28:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>