<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:15:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by wholesaleman on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-221863</link>
<description>99% precise Fake Watches Rolex Replica 2005 collection: Rolex Replica, Replica Watches, Swiss Rolex Replica, Fake Rolex watches, Replica Rolex Replicas, fake rolex, fake watches, fake rolex replicaes replica watch part and Rolex Watches at wholesale-watch-center.com</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">221863@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:15:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-206276</link>
<description>I was told to foward them to [edited email]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">206276@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:38:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ME on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-92925</link>
<description>All these offers sound so inviting.  Has anyone ever bought one of these thngs?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92925@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:04:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Schduern on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-92747</link>
<description>yes, for the last two weeks or so I&#039;ve been getting at least five per day. I&#039;ve been Spamcopping every bit of it, with a copy to the FTC.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92747@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:00:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by liz on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-92402</link>
<description>me too, the rolex offers--from believable to crass--just jumped into my inbox a couple of weeks ago.  I didn&#039;t think much of it at first bu the noticed how common they were.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92402@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:35:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-91155</link>
<description>I haven&#039;t had the Dick Cheney variant of the Nigerian 419 scam yet.  I&#039;m feeling deprived.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91155@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:29:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell on New spam topic: Rolex watches</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/17/114300.php#comment-91109</link>
<description>The Rolex spams actually have been around for a while -- since the beginning of the summer or longer.  

Consider yourself lucky you were spared so long.

All I can say is, at least the use of a specific term like &quot;Rolex&quot; makes it easy to filter out the messages into a junk mail folder or a spam folder.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91109@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:49:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>