<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on First Look: Cakewalk's Sonar 4</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:22:31 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll on First Look: Cakewalk&#039;s Sonar 4</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/14/200742.php#comment-109940</link>
<description>Cliff,

For me, the best feature is the freeze function. As I mentioned in the review, I had gotten used to treating my lead tracks (vocals and solos) with Izotope&#039;s Ozone, but it&#039;s such a processor hog. The freeze function dropped the CPU usage considerably when plastering a track with multiple effects. 

Ed
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-109940&amp;itemDate=2005-01-19+15%3A22%3A31&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Ed+Driscoll+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-109940&amp;itemDate=2005-01-19+15%3A22%3A31&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Ed+Driscoll+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">109940@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:22:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cliff Soon on First Look: Cakewalk&#039;s Sonar 4</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/14/200742.php#comment-109912</link>
<description>Oops, that&#039;s &quot;Korg&quot;, of course ... and the video is at the above url.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-109912&amp;itemDate=2005-01-19+14%3A23%3A01&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Cliff+Soon+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-109912&amp;itemDate=2005-01-19+14%3A23%3A01&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Cliff+Soon+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">109912@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:23:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cliff Soon on First Look: Cakewalk&#039;s Sonar 4</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/14/200742.php#comment-109910</link>
<description>I produced the song for the above video, &quot;If I Fall (Military Cut)&quot; using Sonar 2, using a Kord X5. It took me ... a while.

I&#039;m wondering if it&#039;s really worth upgrading to Sonar 4. The only thing that might fit my needs is they claim that the workflow is better; is it really that much better?


<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-109910&amp;itemDate=2005-01-19+14%3A21%3A50&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Cliff+Soon+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-109910&amp;itemDate=2005-01-19+14%3A21%3A50&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Cliff+Soon+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">109910@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:21:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vlachakis Costas on First Look: Cakewalk&#039;s Sonar 4</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/14/200742.php#comment-100801</link>
<description>Im selling a Sonar 4 Producer Edition unopenned box. reasonalble price.
Thank you.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-100801&amp;itemDate=2004-11-29+03%3A31%3A17&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Vlachakis+Costas+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-100801&amp;itemDate=2004-11-29+03%3A31%3A17&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Vlachakis+Costas+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">100801@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:31:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on First Look: Cakewalk&#039;s Sonar 4</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/14/200742.php#comment-90738</link>
<description>fascinating and invaluable insight into the program Ed, very much appreciated!
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-90738&amp;itemDate=2004-10-15+09%3A38%3A23&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Eric+Olsen+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2004%2F10%2F14%2F200742.php%23comment-90738&amp;itemDate=2004-10-15+09%3A38%3A23&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Eric+Olsen+on+First+Look%3A+Cakewalk%27s+Sonar+4" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">90738@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:38:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>